They reject RFEF manipulation in allocating World Cup areas: Aneta, involved

The allocation of the headquarters for the 2030 World Cup continues to develop controversy, and at this time, Royal Society is directly involved. According to an investigation published by the world, the TXuri Urdin team, by its stadium, Anoetacan be included in the list of headquarters Controversialover the mark on BalaídosCelta de Vigo Stadium, which in a first report is one of the 11 selected home contest matches. However, in a surprising change and in a short time, Aneta has climbed into the classificationGoing from being out to be one of the options that magno -Host in the World Cup, rather than balaidos.

The newspaper The world He submitted two reports where the office of the headquarters was different in a few days. In the first version, Baliaidos conquered the —11 position with 10,2004 points, While Aneta is left with a mark of 10,1226. However, only 48 hours later, Changed Royal Society Stadium Rating. This change took place mainly In an adjustment to one of the subfactors linked to the technical project of the candidate, subfactor A1, associated with the intervention level to be conducted at the stadium, an adjustment favored the mark of Aneta, from 15 to 20 points.

RFEF’s official resources consulted by the world have identified the change in classification, explaining that this is a Technical correction of the standard established by FIFA, especially regarding maintenance and the required interventions at each stage. According to the Federation, this decision is based on the premise that Aneta will not require significant additional works to comply with FIFA standards.

Anaeta, clear beneficiary

For Royal Society, this change in classification represents a significant progress In his fight to be part of the stadiums that will provide matches of the 2030 World Cup, where Aneta confirmed as an official headquarters. However, controversy developed discomfort with other parts of Spain, such as in Vigo, where the mayor Abel Caballero showed his anger for the exclusion of Balaídos. Despite the explanations offered by the RFEF, the lack of transparency in the selection process has increased doubts about the equity and objectivity in the headquarters review.

The process, marked by this change in questions and transparency questions, reflects a complex panorama. The Donostiarra Club, who saw how the stadium went from being ruled to be part of the list of places, was in a delicate position in terms of public understanding of the fair selection of enclosures. The situation continues to develop, and the Royal Society, as a club in the city, will follow closely How tensions were resolved between the RFEF and the local authorities.