The Metropolitan’s VAR is correct

Date:

The Metropolitano’s VAR was correct in the decision taken yesterday at the Metropolitano Stadium, at the time it was delivered, and that meant the maximum penalty that ultimately gave victory to Atletico Madrid. This is how they understood it from the establishment of the arbitration and within the detailed examination of the day.

In a very complex game play then Richard of Burgos, yesterday was appointed as VAR at rojiblanco stadium and last Thursday he acted as AVAR at Atalanta-Leizpig with Mateu Lahoz, warning the referee to review the action when he understood that RDT had extended his jump arm to clear the ball. And it is in revision, that the time has been fulfilled and the whole stage is pending, which Figueroa Vazquez He did not hesitate to call for the maximum penalty for the Spanish striker. A decision that even the player himself could not criticize for a few minutes he faced the microphones on the television to express his feelings about what happened in the match and in the final moments.

Then, in a game of enormous complexity, the Basque international referee and referee were cataloged as VARs by FIFA and UEFA, he was right in notifying the field referee to go to the monitor when he understood that we were faced with an obvious and obvious failure in case the hand was not punished.

Because he was also right, according to the CTA itself, in pointing the foul in the 71st minute of Kondogbia using the hand The referee is correct once the Frenchman from the start raises his hand from the start.

Another thing is its consequences. Since it was a hand that came on a rebound, it should not be punished by a yellow card, which was also second for the Frenchman and led to his expulsion.

Because, even the referee said in the minutes that he showed him the yellow card because he understood that “he was playing the ball with his arm, thus avoiding a promising attack”; the promising condition of this attack will no longer have an effect once it is repelled.

A card that, added to one he saw for a stomp in the 36th minute of the first half, involves the French expulsion in the middle of the second half.

Source: La Verdad

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Share post:

Subscribe

Popular

More like this
Related