Var, hawke-eye or foxtenn. Whatever the denomination and technology used. The arbitration system after video review was a ease for the seat judge, but also a source of controversy that also resulted in a relatively surrealist rifirrafe of two tennis players involved.
It was hot at the end of the first set between Kazajo Alexander Bublik and the Canada Felix Auger-Alassime, of the initial tie of Dubai ATP 500 contests.
Deciding on ‘Tiebreak’, with 6-6, Bublik cornered Auger-Alassime, ending to throw the ball into the standing standards. However, the North American asked the referee to repeat the point.
The video has proven how LIA collects the length of a ball at stake. He is flying in the air, he is persecuted by Auger-Alassime, guilty of the child.
The seat judge decides to repeat the point. He convinced the beneficiary, Auger-Alassime, not much of the injured party, Bublik, with one of his unpredictable reactions. He caught his rival with a spoon serving, below and very short.
Challenging Canada, Bublik He asked the public to pull out his daring time and time. But it wasn’t enough with 7-6 and set a ball. The revenge of Auger-Assiption He came to a mistake by Kazakh himself, which eventually made a double Ara 9-7 foul from the American.
Auger-Assiption He underlined the pique taking his finger to the ear, requesting that the stance would also applaud a point that was not usually celebrated because it was a lump error, not a success. Except for the Davis Cup or when a local tennis player plays, that doesn’t happen.
Electronic arbitration provides a lot of and different.
Source: La Verdad
I’m Robert Maynard, and I am a passionate journalist with experience in sports writing. For the last few years, I have been writing for Today Times Live. My main focus has been on sports-related stories and features. With my strong background in journalism and extensive knowledge of the industry, I am able to provide readers with well-crafted pieces that are both informative and engaging.
