A lot of criticism of the double budget presented by the Spö financial minister Markus Marterbauer on Tuesday came from NGOs. But even from your own (red) rows, words are warning.
So there was cold warmth from AK-President Renate Anderl. “The federal government determines the right accents, but not everyone makes a fair contribution to the renovation of the shortage,” emphasizes the Spö -politician.
“Incredibly compromise”
According to her, offensive measures are to breathe new life into employment and education. “Consolidation is also necessary because of the deficit in the previous legislative period,” says Anderl. But in the beginning, consolidation is too strong. It therefore requires a larger part of the tax -related taxes for the budget of 2027. Otherwise, according to Anderl, only an unbalanced compromise will be possible again.
Criticism of NGOs of savings in the climate area
A lot of criticism of the double budget presented came from NGOs. Greenpeace sees the important subject (environment and climate protection) “under the bikes”, while the subsidies of climate damage were spared. “This is completely incomprehensible. Everyone who saves today in climate protection must expect billions of fine for missed climate goals tomorrow,” said Jasmin Duregger, climate and energy expert at Greenpeace.
Scherpe woorden kwamen ook uit de wereldwijde 2000: “De prioriteitsinstelling in dit budget is helemaal verkeerd. Investeringen in maatregelen voor klimaatbescherming zijn nodig om te overleven en niet luxe. Het behouden van het behouden van milieuvriendelijke, onrechtvaardige subsidies in miljarden miljarden voor het milieu schadelijke, ongerechtvaardigde subsidies in miljarden miljarden in de voorkant van de fossillobby,” bekritiseerde johannes wahannes Wahannes Wahannes Wahannes Wahannes Wahannes Wahannes Wahannes Wahannes Wahannes Wahlm-Wahannes, Climate and EnergiepoorSpoorSpoorgeorganisatie. To become an autocratic regiment, regardless of fossil energy, Austria has to invest more in renewable energy sources and protection of social climate.
Criticism of the lack of reducing environmental subsidies
The WWF lacks structural reforms in the budget and criticizes the enormous cuts in climate and environmental protection. Nature Conservation in particular needs a stronger donation. “The planned double budget contains several wrong signals and is generally a missed opportunity,” said WWF program manager Hanna Simons.
Source: Krone
I’m Ben Stock, a journalist and author at Today Times Live. I specialize in economic news and have been working in the news industry for over five years. My experience spans from local journalism to international business reporting. In my career I’ve had the opportunity to interview some of the world’s leading economists and financial experts, giving me an insight into global trends that is unique among journalists.
