The Supreme confirms the convict of the counselor who called for the falsification of the degree of Master of Digitalism.

The Supreme Court has decided to approve the two-year imprisonment of Teresa Feito, a former councilor of the Madrid community, for aiding and abetting the falsification of Christina Fuentes’s master’s protocol. The judges rejected his appeal against the conviction for forging documents. No one has appealed the acquittal of the former president of the Madrid community, and no other convict, Professor Cecilia Rosado, who falsified the protocols at Feito’s request, has appealed a single year in prison.

The falsification of this protocol, which was used by Fifuentes himself to defend his innocence before the Assembly of Madrid, took place after elDiario.es exclusively revealed various irregularities in obtaining a master’s degree from Ray Juan Carlos University. His scores were altered to get noticeable subjects in which he had previously appeared as not being presented, and his master’s dissertation was also irregularly changed by an official.

In the midst of a political storm due to exclusive coverage of this newspaper, Ministry of Education adviser Maite Feito forced teacher Cecilia Rosado to prepare a false report showing that Fifuentes was attending her master’s degree and that all her records were gone. As a rule.

The teacher, counselor and Fifuentes were brought to the bench, but the Madrid court and the Capital High Court of Justice realized that the former president could not be tried: the judges found that he was interested in obtaining these forged documents, there is no evidence that he really encouraged As Feito did. The prosecution has not appealed the acquittal of Fifuentes to the Supreme Court.

The criminal court has no doubt in Feito’s role when the case called for fraud so that the president of the region could have the tools to defend himself. “The intense pressure that Ms. Feito exerted on Ms. Rosado throughout the day is enough behavior to make a decisive contribution to her readiness to commit a lie,” the judges said.

This sentence implies that Feito should not go to jail because his sentence is two years in prison and he has not been convicted, although now the case will enter the execution phase. He was initially sentenced to three years in prison, but the Supreme Court reduced the sentence in the sense that he was a vacation teacher and not in practice when he demanded forgery of a master’s degree and his transcripts.