Nearly seven hours had passed since the long plenary session of the Congress of Deputies, during which the Prime Minister, Pedro Sanchez, with the reservations of several partners, had reached widespread support for the National Response Plan for the war in Ukraine. All measures were agreed between the PSOE and United We Can ministers. And, in fact, the speaker of the lower house Confederate group, Pablo Echenik, defended the “stamp” of his political space in some more social initiatives at Wednesday’s session. But at 4:00 pm, before Sanchez’s appearance was over, one of his ministers, Ione Bellara, who is also the leader of the Podemos, jumped about two kilometers from the bicycle to act for peace, reaffirming the differences between the partners. What should be the role of Spain before the war.
The president, socialist ministers, second vice president Yolanda Diaz and consumer minister Alberto Garzon are backing arms shipments, which Sanchez himself announced before March 2, before the plenary session of Congress. But at the same session, which lasted about a month, it was revealed that Bellara and Equality Minister Irene Montero disagreed with the decision to arm Ukraine’s resistance. None of them applauded the head of the executive branch and since then they have been betting on Podemos for all appearances exclusively through diplomatic channels.
This Wednesday, Bellara organized an action for her ministry – specifically through the Secretary of State for the 2030 Agenda, led by Enrique Santiago – in which she once again adopted the “No to War” that her party has become one of their main flags since. The invasion of Ukraine began. All this in a difficult context, in favor of sending weapons because of the virtually unanimous consensus of the other parties, and this was called by the Podemos a rebellious “angry” or “fiery”.
At the headquarters of Carlos III University in Madrid, the minister was surrounded by prominent international pacifists such as the prestigious American philosopher and political scientist Noam Chomsky, the former UNESCO Secretary General, Federico Mary Zaragoza, or the former Spanish ambassador and facilitator of many conflicts, de Jagna. All of them defended the UN and EU-exclusively diplomatic channels, dialogue and international mediation in the wake of Putin’s actions in Ukraine.
“It’s never too late for politics. It is never too late for dialogue. The best time to reach an agreement and reach peace is always now. Better today than tomorrow, better tomorrow than the day after tomorrow. “Better with less death and less suffering than more death and more suffering,” Bellara defended. He wanted to emphasize that “when a peace agreement is reached, because all wars end in agreement, the whole world celebrates it.” “And that would be very good, but I think it’s important to remember that we have to keep the peace in the most difficult moments, that is, during war, even when we are in the midst of a slanderous and media-inspired environment. “Rage,” he insisted.
The minister called for “a redoubled effort in the message and actions of peace and diplomacy throughout the world.” For this reason, he welcomed the fact that UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres had appointed a mediator for the ceasefire in the Ukraine war. “I think this is the way we should take care of and promote. We have been saying this for a long time. We need the maximum involvement of international organizations such as the UN and the OSCE to ensure negotiations between Russia. And Ukraine has yielded results and the agreements are adhered to. “We need accompaniment and international monitoring to safeguard the negotiations and move forward,” he said.
Bellara also called for a “massive mobilization” of civil society against the war. “It should be a culture of peace and not a culture of war, which is set as the culture of our day. One thought, like never before, requires thinking and contemplation,” he concluded. At the end of his speech, the Podemos leader returned to Congress, where a controlling session of the government was still being held, which lasted until noon.
But in the auditorium of the University of Carlos III, on the campus of Puerta de Toledo in Madrid, calls for peace and diplomacy were still heard. Chomsky, who intervened via video conference, condemned the “criminal invasion of Ukraine, which by its very nature, though not its scale, is placed alongside other major war crimes, such as the invasion of Poland by Hitler and Stalin.” However, for him, the “immediate task” is to “end the crimes” committed by the Russian government against Vladimir Putin. Chomsky believes that the United States “must engage in diplomacy to end the attack, and there must be pressure to do so.” “You do not know whether diplomacy will work if you do not try. “The United States is refusing to try, and the Ukrainians are sacrificing them for a terrible fate,” he added.
In addition to warning that “the Ukraine crisis threatens a nuclear war, which means a terminal war,” the American said that “Putin will have to find a way out” at least if the international community is “concerned.” At least the fate of the Ukrainians. ” “The only option is to work for education, for the organization, and for actions designed to mobilize the citizen.” “Survival is needed,” he settled.
The mayor of Zaragoza, for his part, wanted to assess the ability of the people to act “react” to peace. “Now we can do it,” he said, emphasizing the maturity of democratic societies and the end of discrimination. “It is very important that when we talk about negotiations, we say that we are now in a position to have a conscious citizenship that is not scattered and does not work,” he added, adding that at this time humanity is the “only hope”. To start a “global multilateralism” and a truly democratic, non-existent veto, for example, in the UN Security Council.
Similarly, former ambassador Pico de Coana believed that “peace is created and not preached” and assured that “dialogue is not a symbol of weakness” nor “going back is a surrender”. “Peace responds to state policy and consensus. It should not be electrified. It does not matter who will establish peace, the main thing is to establish peace,” he said. According to him, “working for peace leads to misunderstandings and risks.” Therefore, he concluded: “To take a risk is to lose a little, to take a risk is not to lose everything.”
Source: El Diario
I’m an experienced news author and editor based in New York City. I specialize in covering healthcare news stories for Today Times Live, helping to keep readers informed on the latest developments related to the industry. I have a deep understanding of medical topics, including emerging treatments and drugs, the changing laws that regulate healthcare providers, and other matters that affect public health.
