The trial against Kurz provides some dynamism – an overview.
It is a judgment that the entire country is discussing. An ex-chancellor is rarely convicted (not legally binding). Eight months were rarely given for making false statements before the University Commission. Two of the three charges resulted in an acquittal, the third point was fatal for Kurz and his ex-cabinet head Bernhard Bonelli – namely the appointment of the commissioners in the state holding company ÖBAG. Both downplayed Kurz’s role in the appointment of the commissioners. The ex-chancellor always emphasized – also in the University Committee – that he was aware but not involved. But judge Michael Radasztics saw it differently.
The consequences are numerous. The guilty verdict reflects on the ÖVP, but Thomas Schmid also benefits from it. Here is an overview of the dynamics that are now emerging.
Return over
The Kurz sympathizers within the ÖVP are now taking a break from broadcasting. His much-rumored comeback is over and Chancellor Karl Nehammer has been locked up until further notice. Nevertheless, the first judgment is a further setback for the ÖVP in terms of image.
Nehammer will continue to be confronted with Kurz’s guilty verdict during the election campaign.
Thomas Schmid seems to be on the right track – Kurz’s former confidante is aiming for the status of key witness. The guilty verdict and especially the fact that Radasztics found Schmid’s testimony credible help the WKStA grant Schmid star witness status. Kurz’s defense invested a lot of energy to undermine Schmid’s credibility, but failed. The Russian witnesses did not fully confirm their statements in court.
WKStA’s balance sheet has been mediocre so far. Many prominent trials, such as that against Heinz-Christian Strache, ended in an acquittal. The guilty verdict in the short trial gives the WKStA a boost.
U-Committee is strengthened
The ruling strengthens the parliamentary clarification in the U-Committee. Because the judge made it clear: making false statements is not a trivial offense. However, one thing is certain: respondents will weigh every word more carefully in the future. The interviews will become even more difficult.
Source: Krone
I am Ida Scott, a journalist and content author with a passion for uncovering the truth. I have been writing professionally for Today Times Live since 2020 and specialize in political news. My career began when I was just 17; I had already developed a knack for research and an eye for detail which made me stand out from my peers.
