United We Can has proposed that Saris compel them to rent at least 75% of their homes socially and set a maximum number of tourist accommodations of up to 2% of the population in the district or district.
These are the demands that the formation of a minority coalition government has shifted in the amendments registered in Congress to the law on the right to housing. For his part, he seeks to tighten the boundaries of eviction and rent regulation, while also imposing sanctions for breaches of the norm.
Lower the threshold to start price control
As far as rent regulation is concerned, united we can propose a reduction in the price increase threshold provided for in government regulation to declare a tense zone and be able to exercise price control.
If the zone highlighted by the current wording can be declared in the case of a price increase of 5 points more than the CPI in the Autonomous Community during the previous five years, United we can offer to leave it just two points above. Similarly, it offers to ensure that the costs of real estate management and contract formalization are always borne by the owner who rents his or her home.
To mobilize social housing, the Confederate group wants to force large housing owners to allocate at least 30% of their rental housing to social rent, a percentage that will increase if they have public capital.
An alternative to this social rental is that large landlords can give up in favor of competent administrations for their management. In the case of Sareb, a well-known “bad bank” controlled by the state this week through the FROB, this percentage of social rent is now at least 75% of its flats.
Prevent the eviction lawsuit of large landlords without a social rental alternative
The Confederate group, on the other hand, wants to curb any eviction claims by large landlords so that their tenants do not offer social rent, at the risk of exclusion in the event of individuals or family units or cohabitation.
Similarly, it also suggests avoiding interruptions in the supply of drinking water, gas and electricity when an aggrieved person is “at risk for housing or social exclusion”, treats any unjustified delay as “property harassment” and is therefore subject to sanction. .
Source: El Diario
I’m an experienced news author and editor based in New York City. I specialize in covering healthcare news stories for Today Times Live, helping to keep readers informed on the latest developments related to the industry. I have a deep understanding of medical topics, including emerging treatments and drugs, the changing laws that regulate healthcare providers, and other matters that affect public health.
