Congress once again rebukes Sanchez for returning to the Sahara before meeting with the King of Morocco.

A new rebuke from Congress to Pedro Sanchez over a change in his historic position on the Sahara. This time the president will travel to Rabat 24 hours earlier to receive the King of Morocco, who is breaking his fast as a sign of new harmony after rebuilding relations with Spain, precisely because of a foreign policy change backed by his autonomy plan for the former Spanish colony. Debates were held at the request of United We Can, the ERC, and EH Bildu, who supported an illegal proposal to ratify congressional support for UN resolutions on the conflict. This part is perfectly manageable for the PSOE, which argues that its position has not changed as it continues to bet on a solution that is “mutually acceptable to the parties”.

No member of government was present during the debate, but coalition partners made it clear that Sanchez and Foreign Minister Jose Manuel Albares did not have the support of the House before leaving for Rabat. Criticism was once again unanimous, albeit with nuances: Vox warned that the letter sent by the Socialist to Muhammad VI did not leave Spain with “no obligation” and that PP questioned the ways in which the executive had enacted the change. Fundamentally because he had not previously warned the main opposition party.

Particularly critical was United We Can spokesman Gerardo Pizzarelo, who compared the situation in Western Sahara to that of Ukraine. “Nothing but trivial and far-sighted calculations can justify the same belief that we do not defend the right of the Saharan people to freely define themselves against Muhammad VI’s colonial claims,” ​​he said, describing what he described as “disturbing”. In your letter to the King of Morocco as an “ally and great friend.”

“A progressive government cannot use this language, it can not do it without violating its foundations, parliamentary partners and without conversion. Realpolitik “With sad cynicism,” he continued, asking himself, “What if we said in Ukraine that Putin’s proposals were the most realistic, fair and credible on the table?”

Other promoters of the initiative spoke in the same vein. “Tomorrow the government will leave for Rabat. “We warned them that they could not go to Rabat in a position that only the PSOE can defend,” said Marta Rosike, an ERC lawmaker who assured her group that she would not “stop” until the Socialists returned to their previous positions. “The proposal you support is impossible, unfulfilled. It is nonsense to say that this is serious, realistic and credible, “said John Inarritu, an EH BIldu lawmaker.

“I confirm that there is no government. I conclude that he is going to do what he wants, what Parliament will say, “said PNV spokesman Aitor Esteban, who is particularly angry about the issue.” He is going to do what he wants in the plan, which he says exists, but it “Nobody knows, even though he has a claim.” The Basque nationalist group has submitted an amendment to the text of United We Can, ERC and Bildu to show that Congress is showing its “disagreement” with the change of position and specifying support for the right to self-determination, which is considering independence. Options. “If we do not say anything about it, the government will deal with it. “PP, which we do not know whether it complained of substance or form, is not going to get wet,” Esteban concluded.

Citizens call the Polisario Front a “terrorist group.”

Ciudadanos also introduced an amendment that adds to the need to restore relations with Algeria. While she agrees with the text of the initiative to find a solution within the UN, Ines Arimadas’s party will not support it, as explained by MP Miguel Gutierrez, who accidentally revealed a personal conversation with Bildu MP. . “We will not vote for this proposal. When Iიარიrritu was asked yesterday about our amendment, he told us that the Polisario Front had told him that he should not accept any of them in order for the PSOE to vote in favor. Talking about the Polisario front is hard, it’s a little hard for us. “The fact that ETA executives continue to support terrorist groups such as the Polisario Front is not something that this chamber should tolerate for us,” he said. CUP MP Albert Botran rebuked him for this comment and reminded him that he is the representative of the Saharan people to the UN.

The outcome of the changes will depend on the voting direction of the PP as well as the PSOE. “This radical turnaround took place without informing the main opposition party and without informing and discussing it in Congress or the Council of Ministers. “We are facing an illegal proposal from one part of the government against the other part of the government,” reprimanded Conservative MP Valentina Martinez. “Sanchez supporters believe they can extend their seats as long as they ask Congress for a facelift, without seeking Vox support for it. “They are responsible for what they do,” said Ivan Espinosa de los Monteros, who also did not say what the 52 members of the far-right would vote for on Thursday. “Spain is not legally or morally bound by anything contained in this letter,” he said in a letter to Sanchez, who backed the Moroccan autonomy plan, warning: “Gentlemen of Podemos, you are loyal.”

The PSOE has stated that it will support the illegal proposal because it agrees with what its action section says: Negotiations and agreements that are carried out in good faith and constructively, in accordance with international law, will contribute to the achievement of a just, realistic, viable political solution, lasting and acceptable to both parties. “Political conflict in Western Sahara.”

However, Socialist MP Sergio Gutierrez has called supporters of the initiative “ugly” because the explanation is “extremely harsh” because it is ugly for part of the government to “unilaterally” change its position on the Sahara, among other things. . “A fair solution should not be what we think, but what the parties can agree on at the UN, because what matters is not our opinion, but their decisions. “No one is going to impose the future of the Sahara on the Saharais,” said the Socialist, who stressed the need to “unblock” the “frozen” situation for decades.