For sale

Improvisation and lack of transparency rule the current management at Barça. griezmann Y Messishowing their unquestionable quality at the World Cup, was replaced by Ferran Torres Y raphinha, which is worth 122 million. The biggest investment was spent on two footballers who wanted to play on the right wing, the only position where Xavi considered untouchable to dembele. If there’s one position in the squad that’s covered well, it’s the left side, including sunrise Y buckettherefore it was not understood that there was another sign, until it was known Mark Alonso the partner of the son of reportdedicated to representing players and charges Fali Ramadani, whose mediator participated, coincidentally, in 5 Barça operations this summer. Club Compliance says, Sergi Atienza, who in theory should have been an independent figure but campaigned in favor of Laporta and worked in his office, who investigated him and “went around, nothing to see here.” Since the consideration for the sale of the next 25 years’ income (levers) in a single signature exercise is a rough modification of the Fair Play requirements, the Delegate Commission of the League consists of 18 members, 12 of them are club leaders, approved that this sale of future rights shall be distributed over the years during which the assignment will last. And it makes sense. What can we say if PSG sold the right for the next 25 years to suddenly sign Haaland, debruyne Y Peter?. Therefore, with no levers and an obligation to reduce the wage bill by 200 million this summer, Barça only has the option of selling players. According to Transfermarkt, the footballers with the highest market value are Peter (100M), Gavi (90M) and Araujo (60M), only those in inheritance. Can’t even understand what they are doing at Camp Nou. They threw the initial project in the trash, which did not require going to Montjuic and was already given a building permit, to do theirs by moving the VIP boxes to the “chicken coop” of the 3rd tier, the area with the cheapest tickets . because it is further from the grass, and thus justifies that the cost is almost doubled, from 890 million to 1500. Their revised project was not developed, they did not have a license for the main works and they did not get financing, but instead they started to remove the blocks of the 3rd grade, which should be 3% of the work. Too hasty to start the house on the roof.