In all versions of ‘case inigo martinez‘ on the table, it’s a matter of credibility and each person will choose the one they consider the most realistic. Or he didn’t end up believing any of them and made up his own puzzle. Perhaps this is the most appropriate because no one tells one hundred percent of the truth in a situation of these characteristics.
There is something that makes me grow, more than the years have passed. I am suspicious when a top football player talks to renew a board of directors, at a time close to an election, and says ‘good, but we have closed it with the following ‘. It is rare in a club like Athletic where an election does not change the image of the entity as much as the entry of a new owner in a Sports Public Limited Company.
Iñigo or his entourage will never admit that they want to go to Barça for a year, if this is true, and neither will the current Athletic board of directors, if they think so, that they do not care much about leaving the central defender because that way they can save a token that is powerful.
What is strange is that Iñigo’s representative, in the interview with Deia, acknowledged that Barça contacted them and it took them “a minute to agree on something” and they moved it to uriarte so that you consider it before the movement of First Nunez directed by Vigo. All clubs will do this in silence, but it is not legal to talk to players outside of the last six months of their contract. That said, let everyone choose their own adventure. The parties have spoken, now that they let it go, it will be for the best.
Source: La Verdad
I am Shawn Partain, a journalist and content creator working for the Today Times Live. I specialize in sports journalism, writing articles that cover major sporting events and news stories. With a passion for storytelling and an eye for detail, I strive to be accurate and insightful in my work.
