The source of Roures against Bartomeu was removed

A month and a half after Judge Alejandra Gilof the Court of Instruction 13 of Barcelona, ​​will order the file and the dismissal of the complaint that the businessman James Roures Y Mediaproduction SLU filed against the former Barça president, Joseph Maria Bartomeuand his counselor james masferrer for possible defamation and insult in connection with the case ‘Barcagate ‘the same magistrate has now dismissed the appeal filed by Roures himself, in an order dated May 19.

The audiovisual producer accused them of crimes against honor for the accusations via the Twitter account @JaumedeTerror2 and on Facebook via the JaumeUnFilmdeTerror account, created by I3 Venturesa company contracted by barca to monitor social networks and the image given to them by the club, its president, the board and the team.

The magistrate now justifies his decision to dismiss the appeal filed by Roures in that “to combine the crime of defamation, generic accusations are not enough. It is important that they are so specific and convincing that, basically, they contain the elements necessary to define the associated crime (SSTS of October 16, 1981 or November 17, 1987) and in the confrontation case, the accusations made against the plaintiff are often mediocre and lack elements that qualify as the crime of defamation, because required to place a crime. […]”.” Given the foregoing, criminal proceedings are not sufficient to resolve this dispute before us and the plaintiff has other means at his disposal to maintain his right to honor. In others, which in a certain way are irrelevant because the facts are not typical, it must be justified in the third argument about the absence of indications of the involvement of those under investigation in those facts ”, the judge concluded in by noting that “dismissed the motion for reform filed by Attorney Ms. Nel lo on behalf of James Roures Y Mediaproduction SLU against resolution, auto, dated 1/4/22 “.