Rayo Vallecano tussled with Pathe Ciss

It’s really curious what happened to him. Rayo Vallecano as a result of a dispute in the last qualifying round of King’s Cupwhere the Madrid team was imposed on Unionists of Salamanca and at the last moments he was expelled Pathe Ciss. According to the minutes, he was sent off “for entering with his foot in the shape of a plank at the height of an opponent’s knee, using excessive force.”

This expulsion will mean that the footballer will have to serve a suspension in a match in the round of 32 against Racing de Ferrol. This is stated in the resolution known last night by the sole competition judge of the RFEF in which, among those authorized by the match, the player from the Vallecano team will appear. It literally says “the suspension of the match for violent behavior during the game or as a direct result of any incident thereof, with accessory penalty(s) in the application of article 52 CD (Article: 130.1)“.

The remarkable thing about all this is stated a few lines after the writing itself. Specifically the section on special resolutions. And where the judge states that Rayo Vallecano did not send the footballer’s appeal in time. He passed it after the deadline. “Article 26.3 of the Disciplinary Code under the heading ‘Hearing Procedure’ establishes the limit to formulate allegations or use defense methods at 2:00 pm of the next business day.“.

In fact, it literally says that “Said right may be exercised within a period ending at 2 pm on the second business day following the match in question, during which allegations or claims must be submitted to the secretariat of the disciplinary body; In the case of meetings held on a day other than a weekend, the aforementioned period shall be understood to be reduced by twenty-four hours, that is, until 2:00 pm of the next business day..

The writing continues that “having input from Rayo Vallecano’s writing greatly exceeded the time, as the match was played on day 4 of the current“. That is, the Madrid team presented the appeal after 2:00 pm on Thursday, December 5. So the judge’s letter concluded that “This situation prevents the claims of the aforementioned club after processing, therefore the presumption of the truth of the tacit account of the arbitration report must prevail, with the disciplinary situations arising from it.“. Then, sending an appeal to the latter, Pathe Ciss had no choice but to play this match in the next league match.