The Italian press was supposed to have a party this Monday, featuring the joy of a driver like Sainz, for his first win in F1 and his first victory at Ferrari. In the boot country, ferrari It’s like the Italian national team, and a goal from Not moving the one of church. But in the case of cars, this did not happen. Ferrari won for the first time but the fact that Ferrari did not choose Leclerc and yes to sainz to get into the pits when the ‘Safety Car’ came out at the end of the event, which decided the victory in favor of the Spanish, tainted the theoretical joy.
“Ferrari, victory that breaks”, the headlines of ‘La Gazzetta dello Sport’ on the main part of its cover, with the photograph split in half, like a photo broken after a break. On one side, Sainz with his winner’s trophy at Silverstone. On the other, Binotto and Leclerc arguing about what happened yesterday. And in the middle, a text that highlights the tension there is: “The two-sided red. Sainz triumphs at Silverstone but the Leclerc case breaks out.” “First victory for the Spaniard. Charles, again punished in the pits. ‘Leaving me was the wrong choice,'” ‘La Gazzetta’ featured in a section of its front page, citing statements by Leclerc.
And on his website, more of the same. “Sainz’s first win! But Ferrari’s win was split in half: Leclerc was only 4th.”
“The only smile is from Carlos Sainz, who in the 150th GP manages to break the taboo of success. But Cavallino’s decision to leave Charles Leclerc on the track (…) is shocking,” the prestigious said. newspaper. Rosas, who did not hesitate to point out in his notes that “the best was Leclerc”, offered an article on the margin on the tension between Leclerc and Binotto and on the statements of the two.
“Leclerc’s case comes out”
“Sainz’s Ferrari won and Leclerc’s case came out”, headlines the generalist ‘Il Corriere della Sera’ on one of his cover briefs, on the upper left of his ‘first page’. In this newspaper it becomes clearer. Sainz’s success has a piece, the narrative, while the Leclerc controversy is starring in a piece with statements by Charles and Binotto, a news piece with Grand Prix records, with 10 for Leclerc and a 5 for Ferrari despite the success, and another piece of opinion whose headline was as follows: “If I were Leclerc, I would ask myself: ‘But what else do I need to do?’ The merits should weigh more. ”
In this latest article, journalist Giorgio Terruzzi showed that he sided with Leclerc: “Mistake, if one can say a mistake after a victory, doesn’t really refer to the pit stop that Charles missed, but in maintaining positions.Leclerc’s merits should weigh more.If I were Leclerc, it would be harder for me to accept the GP result.I apologize for the comparison.The truth is this kid makes anthological number since the first corner of the World Cup “.
“The list of his efforts, including those on Sunday, in a monumental defensive position, with harder and slower tires, puts him in a motorsport stratosphere. Mistakes? Just one, in Imola, in an attempt to recover from a bad situation. day, “he said. But there is more. After Silverstone, Sainz is just 11 points behind Leclerc in the F1 World Championship, for whatever reason. But this article highlights that Ferrari must favor Charles to fight for the title. “Leclerc had a rhythm that Sainz did not follow. But Sainz, in his glory days, made a mistake by leaving Verstappen free in the beginning. But Leclerc was fighting for the title. But Sainz was cannot pretend, at this point of the journey, in favor of any self -interest, ”he said, surprisingly leaving Carlos at odds.
“Of course, the Spaniard is looking for his first victory. But on balance with Maranello, Leclerc’s merits must be more than legitimate dreams.”
“Sainz succeeded after fear”
“Sainz triumphs after terror”, headlines ‘Il Corriere dello Sport’ in the upper left of its cover, giving more prominence to football. In this case, this diary focuses on Carlos ’success and the‘ horror ’experienced by Zhou’s accident, with no consequences for the pilot thanks to the‘ halo ’.
“A Lost Double”
For its part, ‘La Stampa’ highlights the fact that Ferrari has “lost a clear opportunity” for the double. “Ferrari, triumph of Sainz. The World Cup is at a turning point,” the newspaper headlined on its front page. “Carlos was celebrating, while Charles was furious. Ferrari won at Silverstone but the post-race after two Carlos (Carlos and Charles) was high tension. Sainz was looking for his first race victory and found it .Leclerc, on the other hand, had a chance to recover from the World Cup classification and failed “, the statement of the said newspaper.
Source: La Verdad

I’m Wayne Wickman, a professional journalist and author for Today Times Live. My specialty is covering global news and current events, offering readers a unique perspective on the world’s most pressing issues. I’m passionate about storytelling and helping people stay informed on the goings-on of our planet.