“The best player in the history of the Dutch team?” For Maldini this is not CRUYFF!

Yesterday, in the ‘El Partidazo’ program, it was urged Maldini To choose, among many, the best player of choosing the Netherlands. It was made clear that it wasn’t about choosing the best Dutch footballer but the best Dutchman in his choice, not his club. The cooperating was given a ride on the options, and did not choose what many would expect.

“What is the best player with Holland for you? Not in his club … In his choice. Robben or Kluiferts asked him?” After a few seconds of thinking, Maldini replied that the former end of Real Madrid. “Robben or Davids? Robben.” “Robben or Gulllit? Gullit.” “Gullit or van nistelrooy? Gullit.” “Gullit or rijkaard? They are even, but gullit.” “Gullit or Van Persie? Gulllit, of course.” “Gullit or Neeskens? Is that what Gullit did to the national team … I stayed with Gulllit.” “Gulllit or Bergkamp? Ufff … gulllit.” “Gullit or sededof? Gulllit”. “Gullit or van der sar? Gulllit, of course.” “Gullit or sneijder? Gullit.” “Gullit or Koeman? Koman is also European champion, but gullit.” “Glitlit or Van Basten? I stayed with Van Basten, he did more than Gulllit in choice.”

And finally … “Are they going to Basten or Cruyff? Well look … If we just stick to the Dutch group, I stay with Van Basten.” Then, the cooperating clarified that “Cruyff is better as a player.” “This is this Eurocup of 88, which is the only title winner of Holland, that goal in the final and all they did was enough in that contest would be more able to do what Cruyff could do.”