A player can continue to destroy his contract according to diarra resolution

When the extraordinary window of FIFA To sign tomorrow of Club World Cup, This will not be until July 1 when the moving markets of most leagues are finally opened. Starting with the great Europe.

A market in which a certain provision of Article 17 of the law and the movement of players will continue to apply uniquely. There is still no agreement between the parties, especially between FIFA and Fifpro in final writing.

The article they recall was suspended as a result of the judgment on October 4 last year and where the EU Court of Justice resolved the complaint of player Lass Diarra and after the French player decided to break his contract without just the cause of Moscow Lokomotiv.

Specific writing that still cannot be forced into the next market temporarily maintaining the standard of the last winter market and affecting several articles, beginning with the aforementioned Article 17.

The first change that is still being forced is in Article 14 that continues to say the following with respect to the fair reason: “A contract may be terminated by either parties with no consequences of any kind (or paying a payment or imposition of sports penalties) if there is only a reason.

The player can always be registered at the destination club

Regarding compensation and legislation, the transitional article 17 in its first paragraph continues to argue that: “In all cases, the party harmed by the contractual breach of the counterpart will have the right to receive compensation. Provides otherwise, the compensation for the non -compliance for the non -Compliance with the non -Compliance it will calculate taking into account the damage suffered, according to the principle of “positive interest”, to attend the individual facts and circumstances of each case, and it should be considered the law of the country’s law “

And regarding the influence of a third party, the second paragraph of the same Article 17 will continue to be written as follows: “The right to compensation cannot be assigned to a third party. A player’s new club will be considered together and seriously responsible for paying compensation if, considering the 8 explanatory notes -temporary regulation of your control outline”

Maximum period of 72 for destination club to have a footballer’s license

At the fourth point it is where it determines that the destination club may be punished in case it has been shown to be influenced at the time of the destruction of the contract. The transient word in which they can continue to be hosts from July 1 to maintain: “A sports penalty is imposed (in any club that violates the contract during the protected period or the new club of a player if, considering the individual facts and events of each case, it can show that the new club is forced the player to break the contracts during the protective period.

In addition to the sixth point of the same Article 17 with it that the parties should always work with FIFA “The parties have the duty to cooperate to clarify the facts and must respond to good faith in any request for evidence of a room, by the FIFA general secretary or a party.

And finally there is Article 11 of Annex 3 of the aforementioned regulation and where the provision is also established in the new market that is about to be opened: “When a new player’s organization requests a license delivery, the old organization should, within a period of 72 hours, deliver it to the new organization. Enter the new one about the new club and enter the new club and get in before the new club and get in before the newly relevant about the new club and get in before the newly relevant to the new club.