When was a year ago, Carlos Sainz He chose Williams’ choice after Hamilton’s arrival to Ferrari, no one would expect a good performance from his car at the start of the course. Not your own Carlos. He liked the project, what he saw, the leadership of James Vowles And the details told him about his plans for the future, but didn’t think about his trip to this group with a car that could allow him to rule the central zone.
The goal is nothing more than returning to the historic English team at the top, following an example of a McLaren in which Sainz could contribute to his grain of sand in 2019 and 2020, throughout the rebuild of a team that is now dominant again after playing the background a decade ago. Grove as a whole begins in 2025 as head of the central zone, suffering only in a separate performance two weeks ago in Barcelona For reasons of track characteristics. Meanwhile, in other paths, he could still overcome some Mercedes, Ferrari and Red Bull. Key word. And in Canada, the blue car can shine in one of the best clues of the year.
The group led by the vowles has taken a clear step forward which can be a big point in the process. Far away the economic and sports crisis of a set seems to remain without constantly conquering Red Lantern and always has a pilot of payment. Williams was the worst team in 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2022. And last year ended at 9. But at this point of the year, is th -5 with a very good initial car base who decided not to change to focus their resources in creating an important 2026 car.
The massive change was seen, and with Carlos Sainz’s arrival, key for his speed, experience and cooperation with factory engineers, Some may look like an illusion of a change in regulations released in 2026That gives each one the opportunity to find the key to its car design to choose to be up. It can be a great opportunity for a team like Williams to make the final jump. But Vowles are responsible for lowering expectations in this newspaper.
Williams’ challenge is beyond 2026
“It is too optimistic to think that we will make a winning car in 2026. At the beginning of joining Williams, we started building a new installation, a new building to gather people. It is effective to change a building. But not for this person. We have built a new simulator. But not for this person. They are just two examples that start in the middle of -2026. But after that, the whole car was designed, so the tools weren’t really effective. There are systems that we put on online that we started in 2024 and many systems we started this year are still of importance in the 2027 car and the 2028 car, “he said.
“The reason I told you this is because … tWe have a lot of things out of the right place to produce a winning car in 2026. Too much “He continued before the MD week ago.
“Mercedes, McLaren, Red Bull and Ferrari have better structured systems than we are today. We’re on the right path to reach them, But new systems are not aligned by 2026, probably even in 2027. 2028 is the first time I see these systems work perfectly ”. And keep in mind that “there are systems we started in 2024 and others that started this year and will be important for the 2027 car and the 2028”.
What should Williams improve? “Literally, everyone,” Williams exclaimed. “I don’t say it in a bad way, but there’s no part of our company that is at a battle level for a World Cup. But we’re just in the middle of the way “. Vowles have marked the 2028 goal to improve the infrastructure, system, tool and the process of creating new pieces to look at you on top teams. “We’ll take it,” he said. And when MD asked Carlos Sainz if that plan for 2028 seemed good, or thought: “I signed it now.”
“We want Williams to do the team at 90”, Sainz told MD. That does not mean that by 2026 they may have opportunities to shine on a Mercedes machine that promises. They want to start leadership in the middle zone to continue climbing.
But now imagine for an instant Williams is fully -in -law and gives the bell, which surprises all the best cars in 2026. Can they stay on top in that case? Voowles responded, remembering that the team was not ready to follow the ‘top team’ development rate.
“No, I think we have a disadvantage in terms of, for example, how long and how much it costs to make updates. Because we still have no infrastructure, systems and tools at the right level. Let’s take it! But a good team does better than us. We should find milliseconds each week. Not yet, but we will ”he added. He keeps his feet on the floor, but has a clear direction to follow and very marked deadlines.
Source: La Verdad
I’m Rose Herman and I work as an author for Today Times Live. My expertise lies in writing about sports, a passion of mine that has been with me since childhood. As part of my job, I provide comprehensive coverage on everything from football to tennis to golf.
