Arbitration nonsense in the first amendment

Date:

They grill us all summer one day and another with a new arbitration standard for the new season. That if the hands have intention, no intention, clear or unclear… that if you are out of the game with a rebound or no rebound… that if the VAR must intervene with serious and obvious actions… that if necessary to end the “so-called sanctions”, as defined by the president of Referees Technical Committee, Luis Medina Cantalejo. Talking to the referees, talking to the players, talking to the media… All this so that the first match of League Y From Big Hill a decisive penalty was removed from the sleeve in the victory of Osasuna he is new Seville (2-1) in a play where the aggrieved, Moncayolareceives a slight slap from papu gomez in arguing a loose ball after a rebound coming from a corner, with the player of Osasuna on his back, away from the goal and the uncontrolled ball outside the area. Come on, what is surely an absolute ‘minor penalty’ and the arbitration chiefs seem determined to stamp it out. And from VAR, who were allegedly encouraged to intervene in this type of play, or ‘mú’. Well let’s start.

Source: La Verdad

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Share post:

Subscribe

Popular

More like this
Related

Utilize the potential of pharmacies

Our healthcare system needs a change in mindset –...

Attacks again – cameraman in Vienna had bags of feces thrown at him

The mood towards journalists in the country is becoming...