A jury court in Noord -Dakota has built Greenpeace for a number of hundreds of million dollars. It is about a case that was ten years ago. A pipeline company accuses the environmental activists of a violent and defamatory campaign.
The judgment is a difficult blow to the environmental organization. The energy transfer of the pipeline operator had sued Greenpeace for protests against the pipeline, which leads through areas of Sioux tribes in North Dakota. The environmental activists presented the lawsuit as an attempt to suppress critics of the oil industry, but the jury members apparently did not agree. The nine -member jury attributed more than $ 650 million compensation in Dallas and his subsidiary Dakota Access.
Greenpeace is accused of defamation, violation, intimidation and civil conspiracy. When asked whether Greenpeace is planning to appeal, the senior legal adviser Deepa Padmanabha said: “We know that this fight is not over yet.”
Greenpeace threatens bank rot in the US
Greenpeace’s lawyers described the lawsuit against the group as a “ridiculous” attempt to blame her for everything that happened during the months of loud protests. There were delays in commissioning and violent riots. Greenpeace has explained that the enforcement of the judgment could force the group to hire their activities in the United States.
The nearly 1900 -kilometer Dakota Access Pipeline was put into use in 2017. It connects oil fields in the state of North Dakota with a distribution center in the state of Illinois. In his first term of office, US President Donald Trump had given the green light for the commissioning of the pipeline. The project was on ice under its predecessor Barack Obama.
Criticism of the selection of the jury
The tribe of the standing rock Sioux and the neighboring tribe of the Cheyenne River Sioux, which have holy places in the area, had legally against the pipeline. Not only did they denounce the exposure of the country, but also feared that drinking water could be contaminated by leaking on the line.
Localists criticized the number of juries who have connections with the oil industry or have spoken about the protests, reports the “New York Times”. The court rejected a request from Greenpeace to move the process from Mandan to the larger city of Fargo, which was not so badly influenced by the protests.
Source: Krone
I am Wallace Jones, an experienced journalist. I specialize in writing for the world section of Today Times Live. With over a decade of experience, I have developed an eye for detail when it comes to reporting on local and global stories. My passion lies in uncovering the truth through my investigative skills and creating thought-provoking content that resonates with readers worldwide.
