This message caused a sensation for us: according to an internal report from the Viennese financial director, minimum security can no longer be financed from 2026 without savings or legal changes. The costs for this are now around 1.2 billion per year. What changes do you need, according to the “Krone” community?
The opposition parties sharply criticize the city council of Vienna. Among other things, adjustments to federal legal requirements are required. The FPö even requires the resignation of social councilor Peter Hacker. In Vienna, on the other hand, the statement can be seen as a general reference to the necessary budget discipline and not as an acute crisis. All public budgets are under pressure because of the current situation. The government program will be presented in the coming week; Barbara Novak (Spö) must take over the financial department and reorganize the spending policy.
“The government is supposed to lose ideological glasses and ultimately to act!”
All everyone agrees that things cannot continue like that. In any case, the current system presents itself as unfair for most readers. 607 Roberto607 Many represent that “our welfare state is being exploited”. reader conspiracy 1 Comes in the same horn when it formulates that the system “has a discount between work income and social benefits for non -employees”. That is why changes are urgently needed and “everyone must take care of themselves within the reach of their possibilities.”
“The whole money management should be regulated”
The commentary part does not save on specific suggestions for improvement. Cornpuff1337 For example, suggests that minimal security should only be paid for citizens, provided that they have previously worked for at least five years. Others want a payment for the household instead of per person. For Oxi0388 Is the problem with the federal government and the federation and also Kaboutenberger8 sees the solution on this page.
“Passion -benefit and that’s it!”
People go on Kronileseer2539633: He misses a stimulus to work, so he proposes a change in kind benefits. The coordination of the services that can be obtained in Vienna that you get in other federal states is often required – because work is not worth in Vienna. The fact that one has to continue with a tact when it comes to social aid. KKLLL64 To consider that the field leads to the fact that this is also about “children, young unemployed or disabled people”.
What do you think of the debate about minimal security? Which of the aforementioned contributions will you probably agree? What changes in change can you win something and which do you find little useful? Do you have other ideas to improve the situation? We look forward to your contributions on the subject below in the comment area!
Source: Krone
I’m Ben Stock, a journalist and author at Today Times Live. I specialize in economic news and have been working in the news industry for over five years. My experience spans from local journalism to international business reporting. In my career I’ve had the opportunity to interview some of the world’s leading economists and financial experts, giving me an insight into global trends that is unique among journalists.
