The big question on the questions was clarified on Wednesday, Justice Minister Alma Zadić (Greens) turned to the Supreme Court before Thomas Schmid’s U-Committee appeared. But that takes time. Conclusion: Schmid may only be asked in the committee what the potential crown witness has already testified at the Public Prosecution Service (WKStA) …
Anything else can disrupt the prosecutor’s investigation, according to the prosecutor. Because the minister does not want to endanger this or the parliamentary investigations, she is now going to the Constitutional Court (VfGH) with a complaint in the context of the so-called consultation procedure.
The lawsuit only concerns those areas where the investigation is at risk, the committee has this list. Although it is not about the already known topics such as “leg scraper tool” etc., ÖVP faction leader Andreas Hanger and his party friends wanted to ask more extensively. This led to clashes that may now be over.
No sensitive questions until the Constitutional Court has decided
Legally, this means that as long as the Constitutional Court has not issued a ruling, no questions may be asked that jeopardize the prosecutor’s investigation. could.
The minister says: “It is my duty to protect the ongoing investigations, but at the same time the parliamentary processing must be guaranteed. That is done with today’s step.” An inventory by Thomas Schmid on those topics for which the WKStA hearing has already been completed is therefore possible.
Source: Krone
I’m an experienced news author and editor based in New York City. I specialize in covering healthcare news stories for Today Times Live, helping to keep readers informed on the latest developments related to the industry. I have a deep understanding of medical topics, including emerging treatments and drugs, the changing laws that regulate healthcare providers, and other matters that affect public health.
