Previously, two reports were requested from the Senate’s lawyers highlighting the ‘unconstitutionality’ of the standard, but conceding that the Senate should allow it for consideration.
The table of Senate will give the green light this Tuesday to process the proposed organic amnesty law and will choose to have this done by the normal procedureas requested by the PP, which has a majority in the House, without the urgency with which it was treated in Congress.
The meeting of the Board of Directors starts at 12 noon and is the first since the initiative was registered in the House of Lords on Friday, following its approval in the plenary session of Congress last Thursday.
Vox has warned of a possible complaint against the Senate Council if it decides to deal with it and does not support its proposal to raise a conflict of interest with Congress before the Constitutional Court.
Legal reports
Previously, and in response to Vox’s demands, the Council commissioned a report from the lawyers so that they could confirm their obligation to act on a proposal approved by Congress. In the text, the lawyers believe that the Senate should do so give in to the processing the proposal because it is approximately an “automatic obligation” in accordance with Article 90.1 of the Constitution.
However, in another report they emphasize that the law is unconstitutional. “The text received in the Senate should continue to address the unconstitutionality defects identified (and not yet resolved) in the technical comments of the Congressional Justice Commission lawyers,” the text said.
In this sense, they point to violated fundamental rights such as equality, ideological freedom, legal certainty or values such as the separation of powers.
This second report alleges that there were “irregularities” in the “legislative procedure” in Congress, where exactly two different legal reports were issued. The first pointed out that the bill had no “clear and obvious contradiction” with the Constitution, while the second cast doubt on its appropriateness in the Magna Carta.
Finally, the report also warns of “constitutional fraud” when a law is drafted that does not fit into the Constitution and that would constitute “a hidden constitutional reform”.
Source: EITB
I am Ida Scott, a journalist and content author with a passion for uncovering the truth. I have been writing professionally for Today Times Live since 2020 and specialize in political news. My career began when I was just 17; I had already developed a knack for research and an eye for detail which made me stand out from my peers.
