After the parliamentary election: – Farmers’ Association has withdrawn and pays procedural costs

The claim that the FPö state councilor Susanne Rosenkranz threatened farmers with expropriation, the politician did not leave her and, as reported, against the ÖVP-related Farmers’ Association. Before the Chamber of Agriculture on March 4, the first day of the process took place, the Farmers’ Association then said that it was “not quiet”.

Farmers’ Association moves in claims: “False”
Now there was a comparison: the Farmers’ Association attracts the claims and assumes the procedural costs. “The Lower Austrian Farmers’ Association and Johannes Schmuckenschlager Serveen The claim that the State Council Susanne Rosenkranz must expropriate plans for the expropriation of the farmers and/or threatening farmers in connection with the implementation of the Renaturation Regulation,” says a broadcast of the Farmers’ Association ‘Association.

“Give at any point”
The fact that the comparison was made only a few days after the agricultural room “should of course not be a coincidence,” says Rosenkanz. “The Farmers’ Association and Johannes Schmuckenchlager easily spread fake news,” emphasizes the state member of the state. Here in the farmers’ election campaign with unfair means against them and the FPö was made and campaign was held. “The fact that the farmers’ association was wrong shows that it is not a comparison in the classical sense, because I never admitted at any time,” says the FPö politician.