The leftovers fly again between the FPö and the Spö. A central element in this dispute is the large number of parliamentary questions from the FPö with regard to a “Corona processing”. How do our readers see this argument? In the following we have put together some votes from the community for you.
After Kickl had repeated the government coalition as a “loser ambulance”, the Federal Manager Klaus Racheim against Spö against that Kickl would confuse his greed with responsibility. The FPö represents this action as a necessary check, while the ÖVP also denounces the massive burden for the administration and the high costs thereof. In any case, the high administrative effort cannot be rejected.
“Kickl drives a dead horse”
Many commentators have now constantly risen too much from Kickls. They emphasize the relevance of concrete suggestions for improvement for the here and now and want constructive cooperation and solutions for those challenges that our country is currently currently standing. So writes about ACRE123: “Corona has been a long subject […]“And with this image is not alone.
“The questions of the FPö are legitimate”
For some others, however, the flood of investigations is certainly logical and they insist that the law of the FPö “the government checks with questions”. “The right of question is in the Constitution and is an important instrument of the opposition to control the government,” offers for example
Very intelligent Gone here. At the same time, the enormous amount of studies is sometimes critical by supporters.
“Work for Austrians”
But what almost everyone agrees: the government and the opposition have to do their work in the interest of the Austrians as it is partner comes to the point. The budget problems and the migration problem are emphasized here, for example.
How do you see the current climate with the rough tones between the government and the opposition and what is your opinion about the 827 parliamentary questions about Corona? Which of the statements here collected you go to D’Cord and what is less right? Let us know in the comment area, we look forward to your perspectives!
Source: Krone
I am Ida Scott, a journalist and content author with a passion for uncovering the truth. I have been writing professionally for Today Times Live since 2020 and specialize in political news. My career began when I was just 17; I had already developed a knack for research and an eye for detail which made me stand out from my peers.
