Two games were penalized by the Competition Committee for Ferran Torres already Stefan Sávic for the reds they saw in the match between Barça and Atlético. Since it is a light penalty, Ferran Torres has to comply with it in the same competition as the League and it will not affect the Super Cup. The decision was adopted based on the arbitration act where montero collected the following:
In the 90th minute the player (11) Torres Garcia, Ferran He is sent off for the following reason: Continues to touch the hair of an opponent, while the ball is being played but not at the distance played between them”
In the case of Savic collect the following: “Savic, Stephen He is sent off for the following reason: Grabs an opponent by the neck with his arm with excessive force continuously, while the ball is in play but not within playing distance between them.”
The Committee It imposes these two matches according to article 130 related to violence in the game and reads as follows: “To act violently during the game or as a direct result of any incident thereof, provided that the action creates a danger, but no If harmful or harmful consequences, it will impose a suspension of one to three games or for up to one month.
Especially the second point of the same article that refers to the fact that the ball is no longer playable, as happened with the expulsion of both players: “If the action described in the previous paragraph took place outside the game, not in the possibility of the ball contest or the stopped game, shall be punished by a suspension of two to three games, without prejudice to the provisions of article 103 of this Code.”
Barcelona defended without a grab and it was in a game action
This does not mean that the disciplinary body dismissed the appeal filed by FC Barcelona. As he argues in his writing:
“The Competition Committee Examined the videographic evidence brought to the procedure by the interested club and concluded that the images do not conflict with the arbitration assessment in terms and in the scope expressed in the previous lines to include the proviso referred to in article 27.3 as an exception to assumption of certainty. That is, the description of the facts that the referee reflected in the record related to the behavior shown by the player in the file is not distorted by images, which correspond to the version described in the record and from which the decision was determined send him away. .”
The record continues to use the existing images: “In conclusion, from the analysis of the evidence provided by the procedure, it can be concluded that the action of the game in which the sanctioned player participates, as stated, fully compatible with the description of the facts carried out by the referee in the arbitration report. In fact, these pictures show how the sent off player shows the behavior that defines the arbitration decision. This, in itself, will not be allowed, because of what is stated in the previous lines , to speak about the approval of the apparent material error in the rules that it is fixed in the sports discipline of the bodies that practice it, whatever it is, have fully thought for it”
And he ended by showing his opposition to the argument presented by the club about not having the touch and that it was while the ball was in play: “
This is not true, according to it Committee, which, as the alleged club maintains, that “there was no continuous seizure” or “an act of contention for the ball took place.” The images prove the existence of the violating behavior of the rules described in the minutes, thus distorting the alleged manifest material error urged by FC Barcelona. “
Now he is Barcelona You have ten days to appeal the Appeal.
Source: La Verdad
I am Shawn Partain, a journalist and content creator working for the Today Times Live. I specialize in sports journalism, writing articles that cover major sporting events and news stories. With a passion for storytelling and an eye for detail, I strive to be accurate and insightful in my work.
