Antonio Mateu Lahozformer member of first division, reviewed in Vamos de Movistar + the three controversial reviews of VAR within Real Madrid-Almeria last Sunday, which had a decisive influence on the achievement of the meringues in the return (3-2).
Regarding the penalty in favor of Real Madrid due to the handball by the central defender KaikyMateu Lahoz commented that “in this action we do not see the truth, we lose 80% of the film. That hand comes from a contact of Joselu behind him (Kaiky). The field referee (Hernández Maeso) should ask for more to contextualize the handball. This is not punishment“.
About the goal disallowed by Almería player Sergio Arribas due to a slap from lopy in the face of Bellingham At the start of the game, the former Valencia referee assured that “the referee has the best shot, with all the pieces of the puzzle and the game used three minutes to make something another box. Everyone knows players and be fully aware that any contact they receive to the face is foul“.
About the last controversial action of Real Madrid-Almería, with a goal awarded to Vinicius, Although the images did not make it clear whether the Brazilian finished with his arm or his shoulder, Mateu Lahoz said “I have no idea. The two shots they chose, for me, were not enough for the field referee, the last he should make the decision. I saw two or three shots, which if I were the referee on the field of play, I would have liked to see them before making a decision. VAR is a tool for football, it is not for refereeing. What VAR needs is to have evidence and me in this game I have no evidencehe concluded.
Source: La Verdad
I am Shawn Partain, a journalist and content creator working for the Today Times Live. I specialize in sports journalism, writing articles that cover major sporting events and news stories. With a passion for storytelling and an eye for detail, I strive to be accurate and insightful in my work.
