The International Board blushed in the UEFA Marciniak: “The penalty must be repeated”

The scandal of removal of Atlético de Madrid In Champions League Due to a controversial arbitral body decision, Polish -led Szymon MarciniakKeep cooling and how. There are many open fronts, in this regard. The rocks of Athletic They want to bring the issue to ordinary justice and that battle.

But in parallel, the world of football continues to raise the voice for the unfair decision of Marciniak To cancel the penalty Julián álvarezto the batch of launch, which will end up deciding for the removal of those of those Diego Pablo Simeone.

Now is the International Football Association Board (IFAB), The organism that guarded the proper application of customs, which released a circular, in this case the circular 31, was published this past June 2; where he describes this matter. In this case, the injustice of the arbitration decision is reflected, which contradicts the spirit of the standard itself.

“He Ifab Would like to clarify the Rule 10 – Determination of a Party Result and Rule 14 – The Criminal Shooting In connection with the situation where the pitcher accidentally hit the ball with both feet at the same time or when the ball touches the jug or leg of the jug immediately after the shooting is performed, “the text begins to clear what versa is.

“This situation is rare and, not described directly to Rule 14, Referees, obviously, tend to punish the pitcher for touching the ball before he touched another player, thus giving an indirect free kick to the opposite team or, in the case of penalties (penalty signs), registering shot as failed, “he continued.

“However, this part of Rule 14 is primarily intended for situations in which the pitcher deliberately touched the ball a second time before he touched another player (for example, when he was bouncing in the posts or the crossbar without a pressbar to carry out the shooting, which usually occurs because it was slippery when it was done,” International Football Association Board (IFAB).

“Not punished by an accidental double touch will be, however, not fair, as the goalkeeper may be damaged by a modified ball,” he clarified in the circle.

Therefore, the Ifab Would like to clarify the procedures and confirm that the launch of Julián álvarez This may be repeated: “If the penalty pitcher accidentally kicked the ball with both feet at the same time or the ball touched his foot or leg not used immediately after the shooting, and the ball enters, repeats it.”

“If the shot is not a goal, an indirect free kick will be given (unless the referee gives the advantage when the defense team is clearly benefiting) or, in the case of penalties (penalty signs), the shooting is recorded as failed,” he finished saying.

The last case

Finally, the Ifab Add another case. “If the launcher’s penalty is intentionally kicked in the ball with both feet at the same time or touched it deliberately for the second time before he touched another player, an indirect free kick will be given (unless the referee’s advantage when he clearly benefits the defensive team) or, in the case of penalties (penalties), the shooting is recorded as a failure.” One thing, in the case of Julián álvarez, is not that, because the double touch, in case it has, it is not proven, is incidental, incidental.

“Note that these clarified methods are effective for competitions that begin from July 1, 2025 and can be applied to competitions that begin before that date,” concluded the Board of the Global Football Association.