“Intense” conversation – Tim Walz and JD Vance faced off in a TV duel

The candidates discussed topics such as the crisis in the Middle East, immigration, taxes, climate change and energy. This was probably the only debate before the November 5 elections and was marked by political disagreements, but personal attacks were largely absent.

In the context of the ongoing Israeli offensive against Hezbollah and Iranian retaliation, the conflict in the Middle East dominated the beginning of the debate. When asked about a possible pre-emptive strike by Israel on Iran, Vance signaled support for Israel’s statement, while Walz criticized Trump for abandoning the nuclear deal, saying it would bring Iran closer to a nuclear weapon. Vance defended Trump’s foreign policy and repeatedly pointed out the time limit of his speech.

Despite their past rivalry, the candidates largely refrained from personal attacks and focused their criticism on Kamala Harris and Donald Trump. Vance questioned why Harris had not tackled inflation and immigration more effectively during her time in office, while Walz accused Trump of blocking a bipartisan border security bill.

Other topics discussed included immigration, gun violence and abortion rights. Walz sharply criticized Trump for appointing judges who overturned the Roe v. Wade proposal, while Vance opposed a national abortion ban. Trump made parallel comments on social media, making it clear he would reject such a ban.

Vance presented himself as friendly and optimistic during the debate, advocating greater energy production in the United States and explaining Trump’s trade policies. Before the debate, a poll showed Vance was viewed unfavorably by 51 percent of voters, while Walz was viewed favorably by 44 percent. Political analysts point out that vice presidential debates are rarely decisive, but small shifts in opinion could be significant this election year with Trump and Harris locked in swing states.