In March 2024, an executive officer wanted to prevent the arrest of his son by the Special Group Cobra of the police. When used in Mondsee (Salzburg), he kicked his colleagues and threatened dangerous. After 34 years of service, dismissal was now as a disciplinary fine.
March 12, 2024 was “the blackest day of my life,” said the Salzburg Police Officer (55) for the federal administrative court. At the time, the incident not only caused a heart attack by the executive officer, now also led to his release of the police service, as can be read in a current court decision. That March evening, the special unit of the police of Cobra Police stormed the man’s house in the Mondsee area.
Even 34 years of service
The reason was the arrest of the son (29) for the suspicion of the serious robbery. But the father, who herself was employed for 34 years of the Salzburg State Police directorate and was assigned to an inspection of the urban police, interfered: he would have tried to prevent the arrest in which he attacked two Cobra officers and tried to destroy them and also threatened them to threaten them dangerously “.
In addition to the son, the father was also arrested. Because of the heart attack that was suffered during the incident, he was later taken to the hospital and operated. The case had activated Austria -wide headlines.
No longer so insightful in the disciplinary procedure
A little more than a month later, the person involved in the regional court of Wels admitted the allegations of attempted resistance to the state power, partly tried serious physical injury and dangerous threat and received a conditional punishment. In October 2024, the federal disciplinary authority resigned as a disciplinary fine. On the other hand, the affected complaint submitted a complaint. But in the procedure for the federal administrative court there was nothing left of the confession: he would “never kick or hit or hit officials” and did not attack them. When asked, he also emphasized that he had not tried to prevent the arrest. “Since the complainant constantly denies the crime in disciplinary procedure, this must lead to the assumption that, despite the judicial conviction, he is not willing to distance himself from the entire behavior,” he emphasized the administrative court and he also recognized a “persistent denial”.
It was clear to the court: “It can be assumed from the existence of a serious breach of duty.” That is why only the dismissal is considered a punishment.
Source: Krone
I am Wallace Jones, an experienced journalist. I specialize in writing for the world section of Today Times Live. With over a decade of experience, I have developed an eye for detail when it comes to reporting on local and global stories. My passion lies in uncovering the truth through my investigative skills and creating thought-provoking content that resonates with readers worldwide.
