Johnson’s replacement reveals ‘tories’ differences on taxes

Date:

Conservative Party primaries highlight the rise of ethnic minorities and the affirmation of women

After the first televised debate on Friday among the five candidates to become Conservative Party leader and Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, a poll identified Tom Tugendhat as the public’s favourite. He was voted least by deputies on Thursday, in the final round to clear the list and introduce the two elected officials to party members.

The ex-serviceman has already received applause from the audience in the Channel 4 television studio. When the presenter asked the candidates whether Boris Johnson is fair, they wandered off to formulate their best answer. Tugendhat responded with a simple ‘no’ and the audience applauded. Trust in politicians is a theme mentioned in this campaign.

However, the issue that raises the most debate is that of taxation. In reality, Tugendhat, Penny Mordaunt and Kemi Badenoch are promising nothing more than gifts to their voters – cutting VAT on fuel, eliminating green costs on utility bills – without presenting a philosophy radically different from that of the favourite, at the moment. the former finance minister, Rishi Sunak.

The current head of foreign affairs, Liz Truss, is calling for a different policy. Compete with Mordaunt for second place. He has the support of Johnson and allies of the acting prime minister; also from radical ‘Brexiters’, although Truss campaigned for sustainability in the European Union in the 2016 referendum and expressed himself in dramatic terms during the march.

He is supported by Johnson loyalists, who unite against Sunak, whom they accuse of infidelity. And he is also supported by those who believe that leaving the EU is pointless if the UK does not free itself from the regulations inherited from being part of the single market for four decades, and generate the growth that low taxes would cause.

A victory for Sunak, who to ease the debt burden of the pandemic has raised taxes on businesses and individuals, creating fiscal pressures comparable only to those of the post-World War II years, would maintain his eclectic policies . A Truss win would move the UK closer to the goal of becoming a shadow of Singapore. The victory of the others would not cause earthquakes.

There are no differences over the target of net zero emissions in 2050. None of the candidates have moved away from the bill that would cancel much of the Irish Protocol, allowing the EU’s withdrawal agreement to be signed. No one has distanced themselves from the ‘Johnsonian’ policy of aligning the economy of the north with that of the south, or the controversial deportation of immigrants or refugees to Rwanda

Never in the history of Britain’s major political parties has there been an election for the national leader with so many candidates from immigrant families. Among the first eleven, there were seven: two of Pakistani descent, a Bangladeshi, an Indian, a Jew, a Nigerian and an Iraqi. Of the remaining five, two are Sunak, an Indian family, and Badenoch, a Nigerian.

Three women remain in the trial, which resumes this Monday. The Conservative Party has promoted two women to leaders and prime ministers: Margaret Thatcher, 1979-1990, and Theresa May, 2016-19. The Scottish National Party (SNP) has had Nicola Sturgeon as its leader and prime minister since 2014. The Liberal Democrats had Jo Swinson as leader on the opposition benches from July to December 2019. The Labor Party has never had a female leader. .

This electoral procedure was introduced in the Conservative Party in 2001, after the crushing defeat of the Conservatives led by William Hague. The young politician, beaten in the polls by Tony Blair, had changed the rules and given the last word to party members. On two occasions, Michael Howard in 2013 and May in 2016, only one candidate remained after the parliamentary group procedure.

Distrust in politicians may have increased, but there is no doubt about the increased transparency. Before the Conservatives introduced this method of electing their leaders, there was a parliamentary fraction vote on the candidates and the one with the most votes was elected, provided they outnumber the second with 15% of the vote.

Until 1965, the election of a new leader was also limited to the parliamentary faction, but the decision was taken behind closed doors, in a clique of a few days between powerful men and others who wanted to be. Until recently, judges were also appointed, resulting in courts with a reputation for independence.

The scandal known as the ‘party gate’ that led to the resignation of Boris Johnson last week continues to haunt the acting British Prime Minister. The UK House of Commons Privileges Committee has given him until August 15 to provide MPs investigating the scandal with all documents proving the celebration of Downing Street celebrations in full confinement imposed by the coronavirus pandemic.

The MPs have demanded WhatsApp messages from the government and the photos taken by Johnson’s official photographer Andrew Parsons during the holiday dates. The documents needed also include the ‘Prime Minister”s diaries during the period in which the controversial celebrations took place, according to information from the newspaper ‘The Guardian’. Likewise, the committee has requested details of all relevant documents known to have existed and were later removed.

The evidence being gathered could further cast a shadow over the legacy of Johnson, who was fined by police for a gathering ahead of his 56th birthday alongside Downing Street parties. The acting director, who has apologized, denies that he deliberately misled Parliament and insists he did not realize he was breaking the rules.

Source: La Verdad

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Share post:

Subscribe

Popular

More like this
Related