The inclusion of illegal migration is a focus of the ÖVP in the government program. This was emphasized by Chancellor Christian Stocker in the first three-way interview after the forgotten. He pushed legal doubts about the planned stop of the family judge and referred to the EU emergency clause. However, it is not that simple.
Recognized refugees and beneficiaries of subsidiaries have the right to bring immediate family members to Austria. To do this, they must submit an application for a mention in the Austrian embassy in the respective country. This cannot be easily exposed to legal. The ÖVP wants to implement the stop via a quota control.
“The first quota is zero”
Interior Minister Gerhard Karner will inform the EU Commissioner Magnus Brunner about the Austria project at the EU Minister of the Interior in Brussels. Karner will also hand over a letter to the committee, the ministry said on Tuesday. “We have announced that it would introduce a quota for family judges. The first quota is zero. We now implement that consistently, “says Karner.
The detailed regulations are first made. The ÖVP justifies its efforts with the fact that Austria was massively struck by family testing with around 10,000 and nearly 8,000 approved applications in 2023 and 2024. A large proportion of them were children who charged the education system – especially in Vienna. Applications for family reunification were considerably reduced this year by the suspension of all asylum applications by Syrians. There were only 238 applications in January. You want to further reduce that with a zeroquotum.
The asylum expert Lukas Ghleitner-Gertz considers legal editions to be exposed to family management. “I don’t see a legal basis for a corresponding regulation.” The emergency section provides for the suspension of asylum applications with a total overload of the system. However, this relates to domestic procedures. “This means that there is no legal basis for the asylum law for access proposals in the context of a family judge, on the basis of which the Minister of the Interior could give a regulations,” says Ghleitner-Gertz in an interview with the “Krone”. The procedural authority is the message. And the message then sends the application to the authorities in Germany.
“Non -Wool is not the basis for an emergency”
Gahleitner-Gertz remembers that the burden of family judges is primarily a problem in Vienna, but it is the ÖVP that a home occurs. “This is politically legitimate, but you can’t mention the emergency situation just because you don’t want to meet any other measure. An emergency is always a non -canal. Non -Wool is not a basis for an emergency.
Source: Krone
I am Ida Scott, a journalist and content author with a passion for uncovering the truth. I have been writing professionally for Today Times Live since 2020 and specialize in political news. My career began when I was just 17; I had already developed a knack for research and an eye for detail which made me stand out from my peers.
