New court setback for Trump for the Mar-a-Lago papers

Date:

The Court of Appeals gives the green light to the investigation into the twenty boxes and documents seized at the residence of the former US president

“The law is clear. We cannot write a special rule that allows any subject of a search warrant to block government investigations after the search has been conducted.” That’s how blunt have been the three judges of the Atlanta Court of Appeals who derailed Donald Trump’s attempts to dismiss the executive branch’s investigation into the 20 boxes of items and documents seized from his Mar-A home. -Lago stop.

The tactic of clouding investigations with pleas and lawsuits has long roots in the history of the real estate magnate, who became famous for building casinos and luxury skyscrapers bearing his last name. This time it didn’t work. Federal Judge for the Southern District of Florida, Aileen Cannon, daughter of Cuban political refugees, who had been appointed to the position by Donald Trump himself, had accepted his proposals to appoint a representative to oversee the investigation of the classified documents, which significantly slowed down the work of the FBI.

In addition, Trump wanted an order to return the items he illegally took as souvenirs until the investigation is complete. The court has concluded that “Celine Dione’s golf shirts and photographs” may have great sentimental value to the former president “but we do not see the need to immediately return them to him after they have been seized with a search warrant.” presumably legal,” he said.

There are 21 pages of legal opinion that go beyond triviality as they constitute jurisprudence on a controversy dating back to the time of Richard Nixon. “If the president does it, it’s legal,” Nixon said at the time. And no, the president is not above the law, even though he has great privileges. Trump is no longer president. It was when he decided to take everything he thought of the White House. Investigators have preliminarily concluded that he had no intention of using them against state security, but had an obligation to comply with laws governing their ownership of the National Archives and the treatment of documents classified as secret.

The former president can request that this decision be reviewed by the full Court of Appeals or appeal to the Supreme Court, but in either case it is unlikely to succeed. The decision gives special counsel Jack Smith, who has been appointed by the Justice Department to impartially conduct all investigations involving the former president, the green light to continue the investigation.

Source: La Verdad

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Share post:

Subscribe

Popular

More like this
Related