It all started with a tormented breath that could be heard behind the black armor that mysteriously covered his occupant’s appearance. It was impossible to understand what was hidden in the guise of Darth Vader, perhaps the most cult villain in pop culture – also one of the first – but over the next few decades Hollywood made great efforts to find out. Familiarity with its origins and its deconstruction, the realization that society was demanding increasing complexity, the distance from pristine and monolithic heroes. That’s how we got from Darth Vader, almost half a century later Morbius. Spider-Man is the villain we are going to meet in the movies before we see him face to face with Spider-Man.
The popular movie released by Hollywood has long been installed in the neurotic phase, where the heat of the franchise and the exploitation of intellectual property have led to such unusual scenarios as the world that Sony Pictures is building in the shadow of Marvel Studios. Like Spider-Man, he owns (in the form of Tom Holland) Kevin Fage’s car, this “Venomvers” or “Saunvers” are only allowed to appeal to secondary characters from famous wall crawling stories, other than animated Spider-Man: New World And derivatives. Used people are usually characterized as villains who have their own movie, they have no choice but to become anti-heroes. This happened with two deliveries poisonHappening now Morbius.
Darth Vader was scary, but he soon became the subject of a large-budget film infantilization led by George Lucas and Steven Spielberg in the 1980s. That is why when he died, he did it among the Evocians and redeemed them from their evil past. Approaching 2000 and 9/11, though model Block Buster He had to develop some uncertainty in order to maintain a relationship with a less impressive public. Therefore, Lucas’s move, dedicated to three new films Star Wars Explained what Darth Vader became Darth Vader. Although he did not receive critical applause at the time, this quest for the humanization of the villain would have been very influential.
The villain became a protagonist, and a painful listing of his injuries and motivations led him to become an antihero: a man who performs dubious actions but from a moral compass that the viewer understands while cheerfully opposing him. Paying attention to what drives the actions of a potential villain can lead to a radical change in history that we thought we knew as the musical asserts, as acknowledged Evil Around an evil witch ᲝZi Magician. And how he imitated it years later The villainA major film of revisionism used by Disney in recent years.
The villain Gave way Cruel, And it became clear that no matter how gray was played, this dynamic had to be changed on the board in a way that was familiar to the public. That is, compassion for the perpetrator led to the staging of an even worse perpetrator next to him, who had to face him with a submissive gesture. The superhero narrative is the one that best absorbs this phenomenon, and where it can be most simply noted that everything has always been subject to the public being given new characters, with a corresponding “dark” or “adult” claim that distinguishes them from canonical characters. . There are exceptions, of course. The Avengers: Infinity War He offered us an exciting game of perspective with a genocide without an alibi, Thanos. And then there is Joker.
There is no such thing as a magnetic joker in comics. Neither in the cinema. Since then, the film’s transmission strategy has also included explaining its past and explaining it to other villains, but since the latter has turned out to be a “system” – understood as a confusing compound of socio-political circumstances – Joker It has automatically become something disgusting that has overtaken the superhero genre. poison He had to play in more humble leagues, so Sony’s inauguration was carried out in two parts based on accomplice and promised, but never overt violence, due to age assessment.
Very poison Რa Poison: There will be slaughter They worked at the box office and paved the way for Michael Morbius. Created by Roy Thomas and Gill Kane in the 1970s, Morbius, nicknamed the Living Vampire, sporadically fought the spider. As in the case of Venom, the comic book precedent laid the groundwork for his role as more complex than the role of the antagonist, as evidenced by his own comic book series and his tragic character. Morbius was once a prestigious biochemist, but now he is forced to drink blood and commit crimes, according to the tradition of so many characters who do what they do because they have no other choice, good at heart. Like Darth Vader himself.
In short, a film entirely dedicated to Morbius should not work. The problem arises when there is no human spider that sponsors him – we have already met Venom, for better or worse, Spider 3 By Sam Rhyme – and the film cares more about continuing the structure of the unlikely franchisee where it’s a part than about its own consistency.
Morbius Directed by Daniel Espinoza, a director with some experience and consistency who signed on to Sony a few years ago. life. A fun review alien From the marked B series, which meant lightness Morbius In the style of which they practiced films poison. Despite this, Morbius It is a film committed to celebrating and blending in with other genres that innovate the genre as a superhero. Yes BatmanA few weeks ago tried to merge with the police and plea, Morbius Does the same with regard to terror. And with much worse luck, due to the lack of a suitable pulse in the direction we should expect from Espinosa.
The film starring Jared Leto was particularly affected by the pandemic, perhaps it was Block Buster That more time was spent passing all sorts of touches in the installation room: an easily noticeable touch in the end result that would undoubtedly obscure Espinosa’s target scene. Morbius It’s a hasty and confusing film where persuasion when it comes to introducing Morbius to the public – a character far more unknown to the general public than Venom – has been replaced by anxiety damage control. The desperation to maintain viewer interest leads to an awful pace, but it also highlights the difficulty of engaging the viewer with what is happening.
Traits that make up a large part of the current crop of superheroes – where the figure of the producer / director outweighs the figure of the film director, which Morbius They are aggravated by significant incompetence when it comes to digital show modulation, in parallel with the condition of the bridge with new parts of the franchise. In the first case, the CGI of Morbius It’s highly confusing, from vampire alter ego masks to overloaded photography, to action scene processing in slow motion, and to the tempo of bullets that take us back to the spectacular cinema of the early 2000s.
Morbius For all intents and purposes, this seemed outdated, if not for the respect it owes to the stellar trend of the superhero genre: these are films that are not so much films as the bells of other films. Understanding Block Buster As a multi-referential artifact, and not as a cinematic work, in crystallized characters whose full depth is devoted to a sense of transmedia and irrelevant entertainment, where the only thing people can talk about or produce a particular sensation is the post-credit scenes. Postcredit scenes are the culmination of today’s superhero movies and Morbius Depicts him in all his awful brilliance from the most depressing of the vintage.
His Religious Beliefs in Multiverses and Shuttles to Other Movies / Characters – Next Morbius Sony is planning They pack a hunter And Ms. Web– Daniel Espinoza’s film is not far from the famous title Spider-Man: No Way Home, However, the inability to recognize and generate emotions forces him to transparently show all these troubles. In the mastered anti-heroic story, obviously, without entering anything. Re-reading the villain is another component of regurgitation of Hollywood brands that no longer distinguishes friends from enemies because they all equally well serve the aftermath. Crossover.
Source: El Diario
I’m an experienced news author and editor based in New York City. I specialize in covering healthcare news stories for Today Times Live, helping to keep readers informed on the latest developments related to the industry. I have a deep understanding of medical topics, including emerging treatments and drugs, the changing laws that regulate healthcare providers, and other matters that affect public health.
