Responsibility has changed – that’s why Teichtmeister judges are now ruling

Date:

Just a few days until the trial of the former castle actor, accused of possessing (and in some cases producing) tens of thousands of images of serious child sexual abuse. The former TV star risks a prison sentence of up to three years. After the additional report ordered by Judge Stefan Apostol, responsibility for the case changed. If he had only ruled as a single judge on February 8, it is now a four-person jury. But how did it happen?

In the originally scheduled trial on February 8, a single judge would have ruled in the case of Florian Teichtmeister. On September 5, there will be a grand jury, meaning two professional judges plus two lay judges who will be chosen at random. They must be between 25 and 65 years old and be Austrian citizens with no criminal record. But how did this change come about?

Supplementary report by Peter Hofmann
Following the additional report by court psychiatrist Peter Hofmann on behalf of Judge Stefan Apostol, the Public Prosecutor’s Office is now asking for shelter from the ex-TV star, who has hoarded tens of thousands of images of serious child sexual abuse and sometimes also modified them. in the implementation of measures. “This gives a special responsibility,” says court spokeswoman Christina Salzborn. The jury first discusses the question of guilt and then, if necessary, the amount of the fine.

The ex-castle actor is threatened with enforcing measures
Explosive: Admission to an institution can only be conditionally granted with a conditional sentence, after which accommodation is temporarily waived under strict conditions. Should the jury render a partially conditional verdict on the former TV commissioner from the series “Die Toten von Salzburg” and win this legal force, Teichtmeister is threatened with actual admission to an institution for mentally abnormal offenders, who are now a forensic-therapeutic institute is mentioned. Centre. He would receive therapies there and be held indefinitely. At least once a year, the court reviews whether the decision is upheld.

Source: Krone

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Share post:

Subscribe

Popular

More like this
Related