There is more than 30,000 euros in reimbursement to a woman who has received further training allowance – because there is a whole “rat tail” on it and she also has to repay the weekly money with the removal. The AMS regrets the hardships, but sees itself confirming that one is bound by legal requirements.
Dark clouds are absorbed about those young mothers who have made a course at a Vienna Institute and have received further training allowance. The AMS demanded the money back, but the affected complaint has filed a complaint. For them it now greeted negative judgments of the federal administrative court.
18 Negative judgments
Of the 40 current affairs, according to court 19, only one procedure went out for a mother.
Crisis meeting in the country house
A crisis meeting has now been convened by the second president of the Gottfried Waldhäusl country tag, who tries to support the mothers. “Because unfortunately it is often not fair. It is sad that the ministry does not support the mothers,” the FPö politician sees few opportunities, because the Public Service Union (Göd) now has no legal help due to insufficient opportunities for success.
Lawyer gave an overview
Lawyer Martin Nigischer gave an overview of other legal options in the country house: the walk to the administrative court, at the Constitutional Court or both. You must look at the individual matter up close and find a procedural error, Nigischer warns of the cost risk of several thousand euros that the mothers would take on it.
Stay hardfalls on the circuit?
This is also the reason why many recipients of further training money have already thrown their shotguns in the grain. Usually only the hardships are left, as a mother from Hernstein reveals: because she was in early pregnancy leave due to a risk pregnancy, she threatens to pay extra 15,000 euros in reimbursements to the AMS.
The rat tail that depends on the further training allowance is long because you are also not insured for the subsequent painter’s time. Nobody offers help or solutions for the livelier -threatening misery.
AMS -Spijt, Confirmed operation
The AMS also regrets the hardships, but continues to emphasize that one is bound by legal requirements. In many cases, the federal administrative court would have already confirmed the legal opinion. The instructions of the Ministry of Labor would also have been implemented correctly.
The Ministry confirms this and dampens the hope of the care of the mothers that the AMS knowledge is still resolved: “Notes for legal -bold that prescribes a recovery cannot be lifted because this has caused the federal government a right to pay.”
Source: Krone
I am Wallace Jones, an experienced journalist. I specialize in writing for the world section of Today Times Live. With over a decade of experience, I have developed an eye for detail when it comes to reporting on local and global stories. My passion lies in uncovering the truth through my investigative skills and creating thought-provoking content that resonates with readers worldwide.
