On full gas valve in the Easter weekend: just in time for Good Friday, 130 can be broken on the A2 and A9. Not only in the country house and among environmental activists does the decision make explosives – our readers also have a lot of gas. We have put together the most exciting reactions for you!
The styric state government has established it: from Good Friday the controversial “Air Hundred” in Styria. The end of 100 km/h, 130 km/h in the future can be driven again. The step is justified with better air values and more modern vehicle technology. The measure provides great approval among commuters, but has met violent criticism in environmental and health organizations.
“No more chicane!” – Readers celebrate this
Many readers welcome the end of the IGL a hundred as long as the back of the decision. “The abolition of this meaningless intimidation has long been late,” says fisizer Many represent. Communits in particular report daily traffic jams and catching up problems on the highway.
“Finally, the highway gets its original meaning again”
A large part of the reader clearly shows that Tempo 100 on the highway was a contrast to many. “Far roads are designed for 1.30 km / h!” Nemesis2022. The opinion is clear: if you want to drive slower, you can do that – but please voluntarily.
“Not the cars, but trucks are the problem”
Various readers make clear: the air hundreds are getting the wrong one. Trucks are responsible for most of the fine dust, noise and NOx, so the limitation for cars had brought little. “The Air Hundred was a pure belly campaign of the Greens to secure drivers,” said the tenor.
“Now Tyrol is on!”
After the styric on the rise, many readers also need the IGL 100 restrictions to relax in other federal states. Tyrol is in particular the focus: “When does Tyrol finally follow the abolition of this absolutely unnecessary IGL-100?” Requires Kronileseer2808743.
“The unreasonable victories” – Care for the environment and health
But while many cheer, others take the decision high waves of indignation. “How stupid can you laugh if you deteriorate air quality for thousands of styians,” is irritated Kroneleser-PEZI100. This endangers the environment, residents and health in the long term. The winning time is minimal – but the prize is high: more noise, more pollutants, higher consumption and increasing risk of accidents. “The air hundreds don’t hurt anyone, just improved the air” Kronileseer2643732 together. For these voices, the end of the borders is a step back: “Too bad for people in Styria”.
Now there are a lot of demand for them!
With the abolition of the air hundred in Styria, a controversial measure ends, but the debate remains. The reactions of our readers clearly show that although many commuters celebrate the decision as a liberation, others see an alarming sign against environmental and health protection. How do you see that?
Is the end of the air a hundred a step in the direction of freedom or a step back in climate protection? Is private transport too much in the eyes of politics, while there is no account of heavy traffic? Should environmental protection also contain unpopular measures – or is acceptance of the population crucial? Do you have to reward the environmental protection more than punishing violations? Do you feel rather supported or delayed by politics as commuters? Discuss with you – we look forward to your opinion!
Source: Krone
I am Wallace Jones, an experienced journalist. I specialize in writing for the world section of Today Times Live. With over a decade of experience, I have developed an eye for detail when it comes to reporting on local and global stories. My passion lies in uncovering the truth through my investigative skills and creating thought-provoking content that resonates with readers worldwide.
