The petite and powerful accused is 80 years old and is in front of the criminal judge for the first time in her life. Why? Because it is said to say that she has threatened your granddaughter and her children in various incidents dangerous. The fact that the family has long been a dispute was clear in the negotiation.
The public prosecutor mentions various accusations against the pensioner in her criminal complaint: once, presumably in the summer of 2024, she should have threatened her granddaughter, who was currently in the house, from the fourth floor: “I bring di when there is ahead.” And in February 2025 she would have rushed her dog to the granddaughter and her children in a playground – with the word “VAT”. And again, while cycling, she should have forced the granddaughter of the granddaughter to avoid: with the less flattering words “go away, you rat”.
Uroma defends herself: “everything invented”
“No, such an accusation is outrageous,” the lady defends herself in the regional court on Wednesday in the trial and emphasizes that he “never” used such words. “I haven’t spoken to the family for ten years. That was all invented.” And your dog also knows three commands: chair, space and outside. No barrel. Why the granddaughter claims that this is “inexplicable” for her. Defender Kurt Jelineek demands an acquittal: “My client believes very much, she wants to go to heaven and therefore does not want to be guilty.”
Fusiness of foreigners as a reason?
For the granddaughter and young mother, who witnessed as a witness, there have been problems with the 80-year-old for ten years: “Because I have been to my husband. I suspect he is Turk. She often insults us as Turkish Frasta.” The son is already afraid that she says nothing: “I am sitting there because of the children. She insulted the children directly. And the police said they could do nothing.”
The accused Uroma and the family of the granddaughter in Salzburg only two houses apart so that you can see each other more often. According to the witness, there would be escalation at every meeting. When the judge appeals to the exact choice of words about the threats, she must revise her statement: she did not talk about a “barrel”. And she is also not really afraid of the dog. The defense lawyer thinks she has shown it more dramatically and emphasizes: “You must have doubts.”
The judge announces a non -end acquittal, but also emphasizes: “It was not an easy decision.” He did not hesitate about the “problematic behavior” of the 80-year-old, but in the specific situations based on the “inconsistent information” of the witness.
Source: Krone
I am Wallace Jones, an experienced journalist. I specialize in writing for the world section of Today Times Live. With over a decade of experience, I have developed an eye for detail when it comes to reporting on local and global stories. My passion lies in uncovering the truth through my investigative skills and creating thought-provoking content that resonates with readers worldwide.
