In a response of information request presented by the Israeli Hatzlacha organization in collaboration with the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, the army explains that it has “thousands of kept objects”, including amounts, of the arrested.
The Israeli army has acknowledged that it stopped thousands of objects and money from Palestinians, although it refused to provide detailed information about this claim that “it has no centralized database.”
In a request for information submitted by the Israeli organization Hatzlacha (Hebreo Success) In collaboration with the Israeli newspaper HaaretzPublished on Tuesday The News, the Zionist army, explains that the “thousands of kept objects”, including amounts, of these arrested.
In the document of the response to the petition, dated April 7 And that Hatzlacha has provided EFE, the army does not offer, as requested by the organization, a list of objects or a sum of the money because it says they do not “centrally” save them and adds that finding this information would require “a manual investigation” of the objects “that would mean” dozens of working days “and an” IrrazonaLes. “
As explained by Elad Man, head of the legal team of Hatzlacha, the Israeli organization aimed at government transparencyIn your request –Presented on September 16, 2024– He asked for a list of personal objects and money from the Gazations that have been arrested by Israel since October 2024 and that have already been released in Gaza, or they are still being held.
It is, the lawyer, of Mobile phones, identification documents, clothing or money. The organization asks for details about orders or protocols about how these objects are stored and maintained.
In its answer, the army indicated that “it is not possible to publish the instructions on the deposit procedure, because these instructions are classified as confidentially and cannot be distributed.”
For the lawyer, “the rejection of giving the information is a worrying guideline whose justification is doubtful And the judicial assessment cannot resist “because it is of the opinion that the conducting principle must be transparency, only except” justified cases in which national security would really be affected. “
That is why it has indicated that the organization intends to question the answer through the correct legal channels. “If necessary, we will bring the case to the courts”said the lawyer.
Source: EITB
I’m Wayne Wickman, a professional journalist and author for Today Times Live. My specialty is covering global news and current events, offering readers a unique perspective on the world’s most pressing issues. I’m passionate about storytelling and helping people stay informed on the goings-on of our planet.
