A Tyroolean entrepreneur is stunned because he has to pay back seven years after a waiting period. Other affected people reported to the “Kroon”. One of them has successfully charged, but is still a loser.
“Shock for entrepreneurs: Earth Money must be back” – so the “crown” nowadays. The case of a Tyroolean who was recently asked to repay the entire childcare of 2500 euros by the self -unemployed (SVS) on behalf of the State seven (!) Years after a maternity leave was requested. “Just like with a game of chance,” the person who is worried about the regulations of the maternity leave for self -employed persons.
Customer payment behavior was fatal
The Tyrolean was at home for two months. What he apparently did not consider: while he guarded the child, payments received his account because of old invoices. And that ultimately led to the fact that the self -employed person – although demonstrably did not work – earned too much during the pregnancy period. “I should have forbid my customers to pay today,” is the bitter knowledge of the man.
The Tyrolean is far from only with his problem. Other affected people reported to the “Kroon”. In any case, one thing can be stored in detail, one thing has one thing in common: the recovered were only carried out years later and always related to the sucho -driven definition of the income that the law allows. Only the possibilities for this are clearly hardly predictable. So it has been exciting for the applicants for years. “Like gambling” – to say it with the words of the Tyrolean.
Another affected person speaks about intimidation
Another affected person says: “Nobody can enrich themselves with parental leave. You take responsibility for your offspring and then be punished.” After years, this independent person was also confronted with considerable recovery. He speaks of an “intimidation” that must come out of the way.
Successfully complained, but still lost
The legislator apparently had to be sharpened earlier. In another case, this becomes clear that the “crown” is present. An entrepreneur had sued the recovery a few years ago and received immediately to the Supreme Court. “Unfortunately it was a Pyrrhous victory because the legal fees surpassed the recovery of children,” the man reports.
The Chamber of Commerce that was responsible for him recognized the problem at that time, but she did not want to lead an exemplary process. It was also said that an amendment to the law has now largely resolved “unequal treatment”. However, it can be doubted whether it has largely been resolved.
Source: Krone
I am Wallace Jones, an experienced journalist. I specialize in writing for the world section of Today Times Live. With over a decade of experience, I have developed an eye for detail when it comes to reporting on local and global stories. My passion lies in uncovering the truth through my investigative skills and creating thought-provoking content that resonates with readers worldwide.
