After more than three hours of intense deliberation among its 11 magistrates, the guarantee court upheld its initial resolution with the same votes that passed it: 6 from the conservative bloc compared to 5 from the progressive minority.
Euskaraz irakurri: Senatuan Auzitegia berritzeko erreformaren tramitazioa bertan behera uztea beretsi du Konstituzionalak
The Constitutional Court (TC) this Wednesday upheld the decision it passed just 48 hours ago to suspend parliamentary consideration, already in the Senate, of the two amendments to the sedition and embezzlement bill that seek to renew the law itself. TC thus rejects the appeal of the Senate to be able to debate and vote on the proposed reform in tomorrow’s plenary session.
After more than three hours of intensive deliberation among its 11 magistrates, the guarantee court upheld its verdict first resolution with the same votes he passed it with: the 6 from the conservative bloc against the 5 from the progressive minority.
And this after rejecting the processing of the challenges launched by Unidas Podemos (UP) and by the Public Prosecution Service against the President of the TC, Pedro Gonzalez-Trevijanoand the magistrate Antonio Narvaez. Had they been removed there would have been a majority switch in favor of the Progressive bloc.
United We Can (UP) brought it up before the precautions demanded by the PP in its appeal for Amparo against said amendments, but the TC felt it was not the right procedural time then.
Podemos had objected again this Wednesday, arguing that these two magistrates have a “direct interest” in the above-mentioned amendments not being adopted, otherwise they would be replaced by the two candidates nominated by the government: former minister of Justice Juan Carlos Campo and the former high office of Moncloa Laura Díez.
The persecution It was also interested in opening a challenge motion against González-Trevijano and Narváez, noting an “indisputable direct connection of the above members of the plenary with the object of parliamentary consideration”. In his opinion, the automatic repercussion of that standard in the personal/professional situation of both was “objectively indisputable”.
(function(d, s, id) {
var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];
if (d.getElementById(id)) return;
js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;
js.src = “//connect.facebook.net/es_ES/sdk.js#xfbml=1&version=v2.8”;
fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);
}(document, ‘script’, ‘facebook-jssdk’));
Source: EITB
I am Ida Scott, a journalist and content author with a passion for uncovering the truth. I have been writing professionally for Today Times Live since 2020 and specialize in political news. My career began when I was just 17; I had already developed a knack for research and an eye for detail which made me stand out from my peers.
