The ministry regrets that the lawyers left the table “having made their demands in relation to those initially stated and without raising any other alternative”. The lawyers criticize that they have only insisted on calling off the strike “without any offer or commitment”.
The meeting between the representatives of the Department of Justice and the strike committee of the Lawyers Administration of Justice (LAJ)which started with an indefinite strike on January 24, ended afterwards Meeting for 15 hours without agreement when the strike committee left the negotiating table.
The parts they blame each other for a lack of will to negotiate. The department headed by Minister Pilar Llop has indicated that the meeting ended at 8:15 am after 3:00 pm without any agreement and without the LAJ calling off the strike which has led to the cancellation of more than 100,000 views since it started three weeks ago and judge.
The Ministry of Justice regrets that the lawyers of the Judiciary have risen from the negotiating table “after stating their demands against those initially stated and without putting forward any other alternative”.
For their part, the members of the strike committee of the Lawyers of the Administration of Justice (LAJ) assured in a statement early Friday that “a concrete offer has been made by the Secretary of State and the team of the Ministry to the members of the strike committee that go beyond “studying” the populations, limiting itself to repeatedly requesting immediate withdrawal without any concrete commitment”. According to the convening associations, the members of the committee “sat a table in the presence of the representatives of the ministry without exchanging a word” for fourteen hours.
The Secretary of State for Justice, Tontxu Rodríguez, who was at the meeting, described the attitude of the lawyers as “contrary to any negotiating logic” and lamented the group’s “proximity” to “start a real negotiation after almost four weeks”. strike in which civilians are the main victims”.
“When one sits at a negotiating table, one must start from the initial demands and be prepared to make some concessions,” Rodríguez denounced.
The new proposal from the jurists of the Judiciary urges enforcement of the down payment clausewhich would mean that the level of their remuneration would be compared to that of judges and magistrates.
The new requirement means that not only will each lawyer individually receive 85 percent of what the judges receive from their respective courts, but the LAJ’s total salary will also be related to the salary of the appellate court, which in practice would mean a double deposit clause, i.e. a double salary increase.
The ministry has proposed to the strike committee to study a salary increase based on the population groups in the lawyers’ destinations, which would mainly benefit lawyers with lower salaries, a point that the negotiators rejected.
Both the strike committee and the Justice Department have held press conferences to explain their positions.
(function(d, s, id) {
var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];
if (d.getElementById(id)) return;
js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;
js.src = “//connect.facebook.net/es_ES/sdk.js#xfbml=1&version=v2.8”;
fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);
}(document, ‘script’, ‘facebook-jssdk’));
Source: EITB
I’m Wayne Wickman, a professional journalist and author for Today Times Live. My specialty is covering global news and current events, offering readers a unique perspective on the world’s most pressing issues. I’m passionate about storytelling and helping people stay informed on the goings-on of our planet.
