“Government Gangs” – court: Kickl’s reputation damaged by ORF sayers

Date:

FPÖ leader Herbert Kickl was initially right in seeking an injunction against the ORF at the Commercial Court. The reason for this was the term “the whole blue government gang”, which was used in an article of “ZiB-Magazine” from May 2022 entitled “Minister carousel continues to run”. Kickl was “unjustly accused of dishonorable conduct and his reputation as a politician was damaged,” the verdict said.

The ORF can appeal against the verdict. The article was broadcast on May 9, 2022 and discussed the numerous ministerial changes in Austria. The Liberal ministers and with them former Interior Minister Kickl were described as “government gangs”. The media authority KommAustria has already approved a complaint from the FPÖ. The ORF had violated the objectivity requirement, the authority’s decision said.

Commercial court sees insult as tribute
Kickl then sued the broadcaster for insult and credit damage and was now right in the first instance. The ORF must “immediately refrain from making and/or distributing the untrue content that the plaintiff was part of a government gang and/or from allegations of similar significance”.

The reason given in the judgment is: “In the overall context and with reference to the Ibiza affair, with which the plaintiff had nothing to do, the statement should be understood as accusing the plaintiff of being part of a criminal association. The plaintiff is falsely accused of dishonorable conduct and his reputation as a politician is damaged.” The ORF must reimburse Kickl for the costs of the procedure within 14 days.

Liberal media spokesman Christian Hafenecker welcomed the verdict: “Freedom of expression is a must – but in this case the ORF has clearly crossed the boundaries of criminal criticism of a politician. Also at ORF, the court assumed that there was a risk of recurrence and therefore the claim for interim relief was recognized.

‘To appeal would be self-incrimination’
If the ORF appeals the verdict, “that means no more than that it apparently intends to continue to violate the law of objectivity going forward,” Hafenecker said, “That would amount to self-incrimination.”

Source: Krone

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Share post:

Subscribe

Popular

More like this
Related

“Inexeless” – Severe floods on the Australian East Coast

Tagae -long heavy rainfall has led to serious floods...

Helper on the farm – Hay fork instead of laptop: what is moving hobby farmers

Harvest hay on vacation. Sounds romantic, but is hard...

Interfestation around the garden – Wutwirt: “Apparently City Twice Cash Incashing”

A Graz Pizzeria boss is stunned: due to an...