Unusual alliances and violent discussions have brought the law to check intelligence services in parliament. Green and blue not only used exactly the same arguments against the project, but also the same choice of words. They both accused the ÖVP “Surveillance fantasies”.
There were also votes in the ranks of the Krisper and Scherak government
The Blue sees an excess regulation for “Citizen monitoring”, which is also “unconstitutional”. They warn about abuse. Data can be used against opposition politicians and journalists. The same came from the Greens: “In all countries where this is used, there was abuse – from Denmark to Greece,” said MP Süleyman Zobra. It also locates danger because the companies that offer the corresponding software are “dubious”. His conclusion: “This law is technically not feasible, legally not sustainable. We will be in front of the Constitutional Court,” he announced.
..,.,
Leichtfried: From the quality of the correct and abuse of Sekshutz2S it can be an export clagrr for Liberal Democraz
Scherak and Krisper played intermediate, folded hands and looked at heaven in the debate option. did not welcome his own club chairman
Karner: We fought for a long time. There are no personal interests behind it, but about a necessary instrument for the police to fight terrorists.
Shetty: This is not a lighthouse project of the Neos. There would be no extremists in a perfect Frien Open Frien and would not be necessary. But there is no life in such a world. Since 2015 a lack of control voucher intergripeline
Debates between the greens and the ÖVP in the ranks of the pink
Yes, it encourages me that surveillance has never led to more security. zadic
Source: Krone
I am Ida Scott, a journalist and content author with a passion for uncovering the truth. I have been writing professionally for Today Times Live since 2020 and specialize in political news. My career began when I was just 17; I had already developed a knack for research and an eye for detail which made me stand out from my peers.
